Automated vehicles vs electric vehicles environmental impact
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Life Cycle Environmental Impact: Automated Vehicles vs Electric Vehicles
When comparing automated vehicles (AVs) and electric vehicles (EVs) in terms of environmental impact, it is important to consider the entire life cycle of each technology, including manufacturing, use, and end-of-life phases. Both technologies offer potential environmental benefits, but their impacts differ depending on how they are deployed and integrated into transportation systems.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Air Pollution
Electric vehicles consistently show lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during their use phase compared to traditional internal combustion engine vehicles, especially when the electricity used is from low-carbon sources. Over their entire life cycle, battery electric vehicles (BEVs) can reduce global warming impacts to about 60% of those from conventional vehicles, although their manufacturing phase—especially battery production—has a higher environmental footprint, particularly in terms of mineral resource use and particulate emissions 710.
Automated electric vehicles (AEVs), which combine automation and electrification, can further reduce GHG emissions. Studies show that widespread adoption of autonomous electric vehicles could cut transportation-related GHG emissions by up to 34% by 2050, especially when combined with shared mobility and optimized charging strategies 26. For heavy-duty trucks, automated electric models have a significantly lower global warming potential and health impact costs compared to automated diesel trucks .
Shared Mobility and System-Level Impacts
The environmental benefits of AVs and EVs are amplified when these vehicles are used in shared mobility systems. Shared automated electric vehicles can reduce the overall environmental impact of transportation systems by up to 42% compared to privately owned automated vehicles, particularly when ride-sharing is maximized (e.g., four passengers per vehicle). The largest reductions are seen in human toxicity, resource scarcity, and ecotoxicity categories 18.
However, increased vehicle sharing can also lead to higher total mileage due to vehicle relocation and increased fleet turnover, which may offset some of the environmental gains if not managed carefully . On-demand mobility and shared AVs can decrease vehicle ownership and annual travel distances, further lowering energy use and emissions .
Urban Sustainability and External Costs
Automated vehicles can lower external costs in urban areas by reducing congestion and parking needs, leading to a 34% reduction in overall external costs, including environmental, social, and economic factors . These benefits are most pronounced when AVs are integrated with shared and electric mobility options.
Trade-Offs and Challenges
While both AVs and EVs offer significant environmental advantages, there are important trade-offs. The production of batteries for EVs and AEVs raises concerns about mineral resource depletion and increased emissions during manufacturing 47. Additionally, the environmental benefits of EVs can be diminished if the electricity used for charging comes from high-carbon sources 710.
Automation alone does not always guarantee energy savings. In complex urban environments, automated vehicles may actually increase energy consumption compared to human-driven vehicles unless they are also connected and supported by smart infrastructure . The use phase remains the dominant contributor to GHG emissions, but improvements in traffic flow and congestion management with AVs can mitigate some of these impacts, especially at high market penetration rates .
Conclusion
In summary, electric vehicles provide clear environmental benefits over traditional vehicles, especially in reducing GHG emissions during use. Automated vehicles, particularly when electrified and used in shared mobility systems, can further enhance these benefits by reducing system-wide emissions, congestion, and external costs. However, realizing the full environmental potential of both technologies requires careful management of manufacturing impacts, electricity sourcing, and system-level deployment strategies. The greatest environmental gains are achieved when automation, electrification, and shared mobility are combined and supported by coordinated policy and infrastructure investments 12346789+1 MORE.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic