Balloon angioplasty vs stent
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
Balloon Angioplasty vs. Stent: A Comparative Analysis
Introduction to Coronary Interventions
Balloon angioplasty and stent implantation are two primary techniques used to treat coronary artery disease. Both methods aim to restore blood flow in narrowed or blocked arteries, but they differ in their approach and outcomes. This article synthesizes research findings comparing these two interventions, focusing on procedural success, restenosis rates, clinical outcomes, and complications.
Procedural Success and Immediate Outcomes
Higher Procedural Success with Stents
Studies consistently show that stent implantation has a higher procedural success rate compared to balloon angioplasty. For instance, one study reported a success rate of 96.1% for stent placement versus 89.6% for balloon angioplasty. Another study found similar results, with stent implantation achieving an 84% success rate compared to 95% for balloon angioplasty.
Immediate Luminal Diameter
Stent implantation also results in a larger immediate increase in the luminal diameter of the artery. Research indicates that the mean luminal diameter immediately after stent placement was significantly larger than that achieved with balloon angioplasty . This immediate gain in luminal diameter is crucial for reducing the risk of early restenosis.
Restenosis Rates and Long-Term Patency
Lower Restenosis Rates with Stents
One of the primary advantages of stent implantation over balloon angioplasty is the lower rate of restenosis. Multiple studies have demonstrated that stents significantly reduce the incidence of restenosis. For example, a study found restenosis rates of 22% in the stent group compared to 32% in the balloon angioplasty group. Another study reported restenosis rates of 31.6% for stents versus 42.1% for balloon angioplasty.
Long-Term Patency
Long-term follow-up studies also favor stent implantation. A three-year follow-up study showed that stent implantation had better long-term patency rates compared to balloon angioplasty, with freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) significantly higher in the stent group. Similarly, a four-year follow-up study found that the need for repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the stent group.
Clinical Outcomes and Complications
Clinical Event Rates
While stent implantation generally leads to better angiographic outcomes, the impact on clinical event rates such as death, myocardial infarction, and the need for coronary artery bypass surgery is less clear. Some studies found no significant difference in these clinical events between the two groups . However, the reduced need for repeat interventions in the stent group is a consistent finding across multiple studies .
Complications
Stent implantation is associated with a higher risk of certain complications. For instance, peripheral vascular complications requiring surgery or blood transfusion were more frequent after stenting than after balloon angioplasty. Hemorrhagic complications were also more common in the stent group. Additionally, the mean hospital stay was significantly longer for patients receiving stents.
Special Cases: Hemodialysis Grafts and In-Stent Restenosis
Hemodialysis Grafts
In the context of failing or thrombosed hemodialysis grafts, stent grafts have shown superior outcomes compared to balloon angioplasty. A study found that stent grafts provided better target lesion primary patency at six months and extended the time to the next intervention.
In-Stent Restenosis
For patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR), the choice between drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and repeat drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation depends on the type of initial stent. DCB angioplasty and repeat DES implantation were similarly effective for bare-metal stent ISR, but repeat DES was more effective for drug-eluting stent ISR.
Conclusion
In summary, stent implantation generally offers better procedural success, larger immediate luminal diameters, and lower restenosis rates compared to balloon angioplasty. However, these benefits come with a higher risk of certain complications and longer hospital stays. The choice between these interventions should be tailored to the patient's specific condition and clinical context.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic