Chf prognosis
Searched over 200M research papers for "chf prognosis"
Summary
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that chronic heart failure prognosis is influenced by biomarkers (sST2, NT-proBNP, pro-BNP, serum uric acid), clinical factors (NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, exercise variables), and demographic factors (age, gender), with tools like the PROBE score aiding in risk prediction.
Not a yes or no question
To use the Consensus Meter, try asking a simple yes or no question
Research summarized with Copilot
Beta20 papers analyzed
Prognosis in Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)
Introduction to CHF Prognosis
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a prevalent condition characterized by high mortality and morbidity rates. Understanding the factors that influence prognosis in CHF patients is crucial for improving patient outcomes and guiding treatment strategies. This article synthesizes recent research findings on various prognostic indicators in CHF, including biomarkers, psychological factors, and clinical characteristics.
Biomarkers and Prognosis in CHF
Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity-2 (sST2)
Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) has been identified as a significant biomarker for predicting prognosis in CHF patients. Elevated sST2 levels are associated with increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death. A meta-analysis of seven studies involving 6,372 patients found that the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause death was 1.75, and for cardiovascular death, it was 1.79, indicating a strong predictive value for sST2 in CHF prognosis.
Angiopoietin-2 (Ang2) and NT-proBNP
Angiopoietin-2 (Ang2) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are also valuable prognostic biomarkers. In a study of 146 CHF patients, higher levels of Ang2 and NT-proBNP were associated with increased mortality and heart transplantation rates within one year. NT-proBNP, in particular, was an independent predictor of one-year mortality, highlighting its utility in risk stratification.
Uric Acid
Serum uric acid (UA) levels have been validated as a prognostic marker in CHF. High UA levels (≥565 µmol/L) were strongly associated with increased mortality, independent of other clinical factors. This relationship underscores the potential of UA as a marker for metabolic, functional, and hemodynamic staging in CHF patients.
Psychological Factors and Prognosis
Depression and Social Support
Psychological factors such as depression and social support significantly impact the prognosis of CHF patients. Studies have shown that depressive symptoms are consistently associated with poorer outcomes in CHF outpatients. Social support also plays a crucial role, with better social networks linked to improved prognosis. However, the evidence regarding anxiety is inconclusive, necessitating further research.
Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis
Age and Gender
Age and gender are critical determinants of CHF prognosis. Data from the Framingham Heart Study revealed that median survival after CHF onset was 1.7 years for men and 3.2 years for women. Survival rates decreased with advancing age, and women generally had better outcomes than men.
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and NYHA Class
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class are strong predictors of mortality in CHF patients. Lower LVEF and higher NYHA class are associated with increased risk of death. These factors, along with exercise capacity, provide valuable prognostic information .
Echocardiographic Parameters
Advanced echocardiographic parameters, such as left atrial volume index and right ventricular sphericity index, have been incorporated into prognostic scores like the PROBE score. This score effectively stratifies patients into low, intermediate, or high risk for major adverse cardiac events, aiding in individualized patient management.
Conclusion
Prognosis in chronic heart failure is influenced by a combination of biomarkers, psychological factors, and clinical characteristics. Biomarkers like sST2, Ang2, NT-proBNP, and uric acid provide valuable prognostic information. Psychological factors, particularly depression and social support, also play a significant role. Clinical characteristics such as age, gender, LVEF, and NYHA class are crucial for risk stratification. Understanding these factors can help clinicians better predict outcomes and tailor treatment strategies for CHF patients.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
