Chronic disease definition
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
Understanding Chronic Disease: Definitions and Implications
Definition of Chronic Disease
The term "chronic disease" is widely used in medical, academic, and policy discussions, but its definition varies significantly across different contexts. Generally, a chronic disease is characterized by its long duration and typically slow progression. However, the specific diseases included under this term and the duration required for a condition to be considered chronic can differ. For instance, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classify heart disease, stroke, cancer, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and arthritis as chronic diseases, while the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services include a broader list of 19 conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease, depression, and HIV.
Variability in Definitions
The variability in defining chronic disease is evident across different professional communities. For example, a study from Harvard Medical School classified cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, asthma, COPD, and previous cancer as chronic diseases. Another study by a geriatrician defined chronic illness as conditions lasting a year or more that require ongoing medical attention and/or limit daily activities. This lack of uniformity necessitates careful reading of each study to avoid erroneous conclusions about interventions needed to reduce the burden of chronic disease.
Chronic Illness as a Disruptive Event
Chronic illness can be seen as a disruptive event that affects various aspects of an individual's life. For instance, rheumatoid arthritis patients experience disruptions that highlight the cognitive and material resources available to them, the explanations for their pain and suffering, and the differences between professional and lay perspectives. This disruption underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to managing chronic illness that considers the patient's entire life context.
Chronicity and the Biomedical Discourse
The biomedical discourse often frames chronic disease as the opposite of acute illness, attributing it to lifestyle factors and biological predispositions. However, this dichotomy can obscure the real causes and lived experiences of chronic illness. Chronic conditions are influenced by long-term problems such as poverty, social inequality, and lack of access to resources, which contribute as much to chronic disease as lifestyle factors like diet and sedentism. This perspective challenges the static notion of chronicity and emphasizes the dynamic nature of chronic illness over time.
Chronic Disease and Policy Implications
The redefinition of certain conditions, such as HIV, as chronic diseases has significant policy and clinical implications. For example, the reclassification of HIV as a chronic disease affects patterns of care and the doctor-patient relationship. While HIV shares some characteristics with chronic conditions, it also has parallels with acute care, suggesting that the policy redefinition may not fully capture the complexities of managing HIV.
Methodological and Conceptual Issues
Defining and classifying chronic conditions involves several methodological and conceptual challenges. Traditional approaches often rely on the presence of a specific health condition of lengthy duration, but this may not be pragmatically or conceptually sound. A more generic approach that focuses on shared elements among conditions, such as functional status or ongoing medical service use, is recommended. This approach emphasizes the variability in the expression of seemingly similar conditions.
Conclusion
The definition of chronic disease is complex and varies across different contexts and disciplines. This variability highlights the need for a shared understanding and careful consideration of the term in research, policy, and clinical practice. By acknowledging the diverse factors that contribute to chronic illness and the dynamic nature of chronicity, we can better address the needs of individuals living with chronic conditions and improve overall health outcomes.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic