Classification of hamstring injuries
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Overview of Hamstring Injury Classification Systems
Hamstring injuries are common in athletes and can be complex to diagnose and manage. Several classification systems have been developed to help clinicians describe, diagnose, and predict outcomes for these injuries, with a focus on anatomical location, injury severity, and imaging findings 159.
British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC)
The British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC) is the most widely used system for classifying hamstring injuries. BAMIC uses MRI findings to grade injuries from 0 to 4 based on severity and categorizes the anatomical site as myofascial (a), musculotendinous (b), or intratendinous (c) 1238. This system is straightforward, reliable, and reproducible, with high interrater and intrarater agreement among clinicians 37. BAMIC also helps guide rehabilitation and return-to-play decisions, as different grades and locations are associated with varying recovery times and recurrence risks. For example, intratendinous (c) injuries are linked to longer recovery and higher recurrence rates 28.
Other Classification Systems: Munich, Barcelona, and MLG-R
Other systems, such as the Munich and Barcelona classifications, are also used but less frequently than BAMIC . The MLG-R classification, developed for football players, uses MRI to assess injury severity and location, particularly focusing on the involvement of connective tissue structures. This system has shown excellent reliability and predictive power for return-to-play timelines, especially when injuries affect the free tendon of the biceps femoris long head . The MLG-R system is easy to use and can be adapted as new knowledge emerges .
Imaging-Based and Anatomical Classifications
Imaging, especially MRI, plays a central role in modern classification systems, allowing for detailed assessment of injury location and severity 169. Some recent approaches also use advanced MRI radiomics to predict return-to-sport timelines with high accuracy . Ultrasound is increasingly used for initial diagnosis, particularly for proximal hamstring injuries, and can help classify injuries based on the origin tendon structure, such as the conjoint tendon (CT) shared by the semitendinosus and biceps femoris long head, or the independent semimembranosus tendon .
Key Parameters in Classification
Consensus among experts highlights the importance of classifying hamstring injuries by:
- The specific muscle involved
- The anatomical site (myofascial, musculotendinous, intratendinous)
- The extent of injury (graded 0–4)
- Mechanism of injury
- Sporting demands and functional criteria
- Patient-reported outcomes 159
Reliability and Clinical Application
Most modern classification systems, especially BAMIC and MLG-R, demonstrate substantial to excellent reliability when used by experienced clinicians 347. These systems are practical for guiding treatment, rehabilitation, and return-to-play decisions, although more research is needed to further validate their prognostic value and refine criteria for surgical referral 19.
Conclusion
Hamstring injury classification has evolved to integrate anatomical, clinical, and imaging parameters, with BAMIC being the most widely adopted system. Accurate classification is essential for prognosis, management, and reducing recurrence. Ongoing research aims to improve the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of these systems, ensuring better outcomes for athletes 12346789+1 MORE.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic