Classification of mental disorders
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Classification of Mental Disorders: Current Approaches and Challenges
Introduction to Mental Disorder Classification
The classification of mental disorders is a complex and evolving field, primarily due to the lack of consensus among psychiatrists on the foundational concepts for these classifications. Diagnoses are often subjective, leading to a variety of names for similar conditions, which complicates the exchange of ideas and hinders progress in the field1. This article explores the various approaches and challenges in classifying mental disorders, drawing insights from recent research.
Traditional Diagnostic Systems: ICD and DSM
ICD and DSM Overview
The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) are the two primary diagnostic manuals used globally. The ICD, developed by the World Health Organization, is used internationally, while the DSM, published by the American Psychiatric Association, is primarily used in the United States3. Both systems aim to provide a standardized framework for diagnosing mental disorders, facilitating public health, clinical diagnosis, and research.
Challenges in Traditional Systems
Despite their widespread use, both ICD and DSM face significant challenges. These include issues related to etiology, the categorization of disorders, thresholds for diagnosis, and comorbidity. The systems often fail to reflect the underlying biological mechanisms of mental disorders, which limits their effectiveness in guiding treatment and research3 9.
Genetic and Biological Approaches
Genetic Classification
Recent studies have attempted to classify mental disorders based on genetic data. For instance, genomic structural equation modeling has been used to classify ten major mental disorders, revealing genetic inter-correlations and suggesting a hierarchical classificatory system. This approach highlights the potential for a genetically informed classification that could enhance our understanding of the biological underpinnings of psychiatric conditions2.
Biological Classification
The Biological Classification of Mental Disorders (BeCOME) study aims to identify biology-based classes of mental disorders through deep phenotyping and omics assessments. This approach seeks to map symptom-based categories to dysfunctions in brain circuits and neurobiological pathways, potentially leading to more effective, tailored treatments7.
Multidimensional and Taxonomic Approaches
Multidimensional Classification
A multidimensional classification system considers various independent bases such as symptomatology, severity, etiology, and course of the disorder. This method breaks down complex disease entities into elementary symptoms and traits, providing a more nuanced understanding of mental disorders4.
Taxonomic Classification
A taxonomic approach to classification, as proposed in some studies, uses a two-axis system reflecting the time of neural damage and resilience. This method aims to reveal interrelations between diagnostic categories, offering a more coherent framework that could improve differential diagnosis and treatment planning5.
Innovations in ICD-11
The latest revision of the ICD, ICD-11, incorporates several innovations aimed at improving the classification of mental disorders. These include a lifespan approach, culture-related guidance, and dimensional approaches for certain disorders. These changes are designed to enhance clinical utility, reduce artificial comorbidity, and better capture changes over time9.
Conclusion
The classification of mental disorders remains a challenging and dynamic field. Traditional systems like ICD and DSM provide a foundational framework but face significant limitations. Emerging approaches that incorporate genetic, biological, and multidimensional data offer promising avenues for more accurate and effective classifications. Continued research and innovation are essential to develop a classification system that not only aids in diagnosis but also enhances treatment and understanding of mental disorders.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Classification of mental disorders.
A generally acceptable international classification of mental disorders using "operational definitions" could lead to greater agreement on treatment value and facilitate broad epidemiological research in psychiatric research.
Highly CitedClassifying major mental disorders genetically
This study reveals that ten mental disorders are genetically inter-correlated and can be classified hierarchically, potentially improving diagnostic frameworks and treatment regimens for mental disorders.
Observational StudyThree Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
Three diagnostic systems, ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria, address key issues in understanding and classifying mental disorders, aiming to reduce suffering and improve health care.
Highly CitedMultidimensional classification of mental disorders
This classification of mental disorders focuses on symptomatology, severity, aetiology, and course, reducing doubtful disease entities and syndromes to elementary cardinal symptoms and simple traits.
Highly CitedTaxonomic classification of mental disorders
This taxonomic classification of mental disorders reveals interrelations in pathogenesis between diagnostic categories, potentially aiding in differential diagnosis, treatment planning, and predicting course of mental disorders.
Observational Study
Rigorous JournalON CLASSIFICATION OF MENTAL DISORDERS
Inconsistency, contamination, and divergency in psychiatric classification contribute to disagreement and should be addressed using certain principles.
The biological classification of mental disorders (BeCOME) study: a protocol for an observational deep-phenotyping study for the identification of biological subtypes
The BeCOME study aims to identify biology-based subclasses of mental disorders, which can improve treatment targeting and tailoring for individual patients.
Observational Study
Very Rigorous JournalClassification of Anxiety and Depressive disorders: problems and solutions
Revisions to mental disorder classifications should focus on dimensionality, simplify diagnostic criteria, and enhance clinical utility.
Highly CitedInnovations and changes in the ICD‐11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders
The ICD-11 classification of mental disorders offers consistent information, a lifespan approach, and culture-related guidance, improving clinical utility and global applicability.
Highly Cited