Classification of psychological disorders
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Classification of Psychological Disorders
Traditional Diagnostic Systems: DSM and ICD
DSM-5 and ICD-10/ICD-11 Classification Systems
The DSM-5 and ICD-10/ICD-11 are the most widely used classification systems for mental disorders. These systems categorize mental disorders based on clinical symptoms and syndromes, which are useful for medical statistics and encoding requirements. However, they have been criticized for their lack of coherence and inability to show interrelations in pathogenesis between different groups of mental disorders 1. The DSM-5 and ICD-10/ICD-11 often fail to account for the neurobiological origins of similar psychopathologies, leading to a fragmented understanding of mental health conditions 1.
Psychologists' Perspectives on Diagnostic Systems
A global survey of psychologists revealed that 60% routinely use formal classification systems, with ICD-10 and DSM-IV being the most frequently used. Psychologists value these systems for informing treatment decisions and facilitating communication but have identified issues such as cross-cultural applicability and cultural bias 4. This highlights the need for more flexible and culturally sensitive diagnostic guidelines.
Genetic and Dimensional Approaches
Genetic Classification of Mental Disorders
Recent research has focused on classifying mental disorders based on their genetic underpinnings. Using genomic structural equation modeling, ten major mental disorders, including ADHD, anxiety, and schizophrenia, were found to be genetically inter-correlated. This genetic classification forms a hierarchical system that could inform the current diagnostic framework and treatment regimens 2. This approach aims to bridge the gap between clinical symptoms and biological mechanisms, offering a more integrated understanding of mental health conditions.
Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)
The HiTOP model addresses the limitations of traditional taxonomies by constructing psychopathological syndromes based on the observed covariation of symptoms. This model reduces heterogeneity within disorders and maps out comorbidity by combining co-occurring syndromes into spectra. HiTOP characterizes these phenomena dimensionally, which helps to address boundary problems and diagnostic instability 3. This dimensional approach promises to improve both research and clinical practice by providing a more nuanced understanding of mental disorders.
Multidimensional and Cognitive-Behavioral Models
Multidimensional Classification
A multidimensional classification system for mental disorders incorporates four independent bases: symptomatology, severity, etiology, and course. This approach breaks down complex disease entities into elementary symptoms and traits, offering a more granular understanding of mental health conditions 7. This method aims to overcome the challenges posed by the lack of agreement among psychiatrists regarding the concepts upon which classifications should be based 8.
Cognitive-Behavioral Classification
The cognitive-behavioral model offers an alternative to the latent disease model used in DSM-5 and the RDoC initiative. This model conceptualizes psychological problems as elements of a complex causal network, which are mutually interacting and often reciprocally reinforcing. This approach provides a treatment-relevant framework that aligns with the complex causal network of psychological issues 9.
Emerging Techniques and Future Directions
Supervised Learning and Nature-Inspired Computing
Recent advancements in supervised learning and nature-inspired computing techniques have shown promise in diagnosing psychological disorders. These techniques have been applied to a range of disorders, including stress, depression, and schizophrenia, improving the predictive accuracy of diagnoses. However, there is still scope for further research, particularly in the diagnosis of conditions like mania and insomnia using these emerging techniques 6.
Conclusion
The classification of psychological disorders is a complex and evolving field. Traditional systems like DSM-5 and ICD-10/ICD-11 provide a useful framework but have significant limitations. Emerging approaches, including genetic classification, the HiTOP model, and cognitive-behavioral frameworks, offer more integrated and nuanced understandings of mental health conditions. Advances in supervised learning and nature-inspired computing also hold promise for improving diagnostic accuracy. As research continues to evolve, these new models and techniques are poised to significantly advance the field of mental health.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Taxonomic classification of mental disorders
This taxonomic classification of mental disorders reveals interrelations in pathogenesis between diagnostic categories, potentially aiding in differential diagnosis, treatment planning, and predicting course of mental disorders.
Observational Study
Rigorous JournalClassifying major mental disorders genetically
This study reveals that ten mental disorders are genetically inter-correlated and can be classified hierarchically, potentially improving diagnostic frameworks and treatment regimens for mental disorders.
Observational StudyThe Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model addresses limitations in traditional taxonomies, improving mental health research and clinical practice by grouping related symptoms and addressing diagnostic instability.
Highly CitedPsychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey
Psychologists prioritize clinical utility and crosscultural applicability in mental disorder classification, with flexible guidelines preferred over strict criteria.
Observational StudyHighly CitedThree Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
Three diagnostic systems, ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria, address key issues in understanding and classifying mental disorders, aiming to reduce suffering and improve health care.
Highly CitedDiagnosis of Human Psychological Disorders using Supervised Learning and Nature-Inspired Computing Techniques: A Meta-Analysis
Supervised learning and nature-inspired computing techniques can effectively diagnose various human psychological disorders, with potential for mania, insomnia, and mood disorders.
Meta-AnalysisHighly CitedMultidimensional classification of mental disorders
This classification of mental disorders focuses on symptomatology, severity, aetiology, and course, reducing doubtful disease entities and syndromes to elementary cardinal symptoms and simple traits.
Highly CitedClassification of mental disorders.
A generally acceptable international classification of mental disorders using "operational definitions" could lead to greater agreement on treatment value and facilitate broad epidemiological research in psychiatric research.
Highly CitedToward a cognitive-behavioral classification system for mental disorders.
The cognitive behavioral model offers a treatment-relevant alternative to the latent disease model for mental disorders, offering a classification framework compatible with the complex causal network approach.
The Classification of Depressive Illnesses
There is no agreement on how depressive illnesses should be classified, with various classifications and varying relationships between them.
Highly Cited