Consensus definition in scientific research
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Defining Consensus in Scientific Research
Consensus in scientific research is generally understood as a general agreement among experts or scientists in a particular field at a given time. This agreement is not the same as certainty, but rather reflects a position that most specialists accept based on current evidence and expert judgment 123. Consensus is especially important for making scientific knowledge more credible, readable, and useful, particularly when informing public policy or developing guidelines 17.
Methods and Processes for Achieving Scientific Consensus
Several structured methods are used to build consensus among experts, especially when evidence is uncertain or incomplete. Common approaches include the Delphi method, the Nominal Group Technique, the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method, and consensus development conferences 15610. These methods typically involve multiple rounds of discussion, feedback, and voting to clarify and refine expert opinions until a sufficient level of agreement is reached.
Despite their widespread use, there is significant variability in how consensus is defined and reported. For example, in Delphi studies, consensus is often operationalized as a specific percentage of agreement among participants, with 75% being a common threshold, but definitions and thresholds can vary widely 68. This lack of standardization can make it difficult to compare results across studies or ensure methodological rigor 68.
The Role and Importance of Consensus in Science
Consensus serves several key roles in scientific research. It helps justify shared language and classifications, making it easier for scientists to communicate and reason together, even when they do not fully agree on every detail . Consensus also provides a foundation for developing guidelines, diagnostic criteria, and policy recommendations, lending authority and legitimacy to these outputs 1710.
However, consensus does not equate to absolute truth or certainty. Scientific consensus can change as new evidence emerges, and it is possible for individuals or groups to challenge prevailing views 23. The process of reaching consensus can also be influenced by social, political, and institutional factors, which may affect whose voices are heard and how agreement is negotiated 357.
Challenges and the Need for Standardization
A major challenge in consensus research is the lack of standardized definitions and reporting practices. Studies often fail to clearly define what constitutes consensus or to specify the criteria used to determine when consensus has been achieved 68. This inconsistency can undermine the credibility and reproducibility of consensus-based recommendations.
To address these issues, recent work has called for the development of standardized checklists and reporting guidelines to improve the transparency and reliability of consensus studies 68. Such tools can help ensure that consensus processes are methodologically sound and that their results are trustworthy and useful for advancing science and informing policy.
Conclusion
In summary, consensus in scientific research refers to a general agreement among experts, achieved through structured methods and critical for credible knowledge sharing and policy development. While consensus is not the same as certainty, it plays a vital role in organizing scientific knowledge and guiding decision-making. Ongoing efforts to standardize definitions and reporting practices are essential to strengthen the robustness and impact of consensus-based research 16810.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic