Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that coronary artery disease treatment involves various medical procedures such as PCI, CABG, and stenting, with the choice of procedure depending on factors like the number of affected vessels, patient condition, and the use of novel imaging and pharmacological treatments.
20 papers analyzed
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, contributing significantly to deaths caused by cardiovascular disease (CVD) . CAD management primarily involves medical therapy and revascularization, which can be achieved through coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) .
The transradial approach for diagnostic coronary angiography (CA) or PCI has been shown to reduce short-term net adverse clinical events (NACE), cardiac death, all-cause mortality, bleeding, and access site complications compared to the transfemoral approach. However, the transradial approach has a slightly lower procedural success rate. Despite these benefits, there is insufficient evidence regarding the long-term clinical outcomes beyond 30 days.
While the transradial approach is associated with a lower risk of complications such as bleeding and access site issues, it has a marginally lower procedural success rate compared to the transfemoral approach. This trade-off highlights the importance of selecting the appropriate approach based on individual patient risk factors and clinical scenarios.
Despite its widespread use, PCI offers limited benefits for patients with stable CAD, particularly when compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) and lifestyle changes. Many PCI procedures are performed for uncertain or inappropriate indications, leading to a call for better alignment of current practices with evidence-based care.
Revascularization through PCI or CABG remains a cornerstone in the treatment of symptomatic patients or those with ischemia-producing coronary lesions. The decision between PCI and CABG, especially in patients with multivessel or left main coronary artery disease, is guided by a multidisciplinary Heart Team to balance the benefits and risks.
CABG is one of the most common operations performed globally and has evolved significantly over the years. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines provide a framework for the appropriate use of CABG, emphasizing the importance of patient selection and the timing of the procedure.
CABG is generally preferred over PCI in patients with diabetes and advanced multivessel coronary artery disease due to its superior protection against recurrent ischemic events. The use of new-generation drug-eluting stents and arterial conduits has improved clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI or CABG.
Invasive coronary angiography remains the reference standard for evaluating coronary arteries, while non-invasive imaging modalities like CT and MRI are valuable for assessing complications and guiding treatment decisions. These imaging techniques help in the accurate diagnosis and management of CAD, ensuring timely and effective interventions.
Complications from coronary interventions and surgical procedures can range from asymptomatic to severe. Understanding the imaging features of these complications is crucial for prompt diagnosis and management.
The management of coronary artery disease involves a combination of medical therapy, lifestyle changes, and revascularization procedures like PCI and CABG. The choice between different approaches and techniques should be guided by patient-specific factors, clinical evidence, and multidisciplinary collaboration to optimize outcomes and reduce complications. While PCI and CABG both play critical roles, ongoing research and guideline updates are essential to refine these strategies and improve patient care.
Most relevant research papers on this topic