Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycemic control, reduces hypoglycemia, and enhances quality of life in type 1 diabetes patients, with some benefits also observed in type 2 diabetes patients.
20 papers analyzed
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is a technology that provides real-time insights into glucose levels, helping patients with diabetes manage their condition more effectively. Unlike traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), which requires fingerstick tests, CGM systems continuously measure glucose levels in the interstitial fluid, offering a more comprehensive view of glucose trends and fluctuations.
Several studies have demonstrated that CGM can significantly improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found that CGM use was associated with a modest reduction in HbA1c levels compared to usual care, with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of -0.17%. Another study highlighted that real-time CGM (rtCGM) led to a more substantial improvement in HbA1c levels, particularly in adults with type 1 diabetes, showing a mean difference of -0.30% compared to SMBG.
CGM has also been shown to increase the time patients spend within their target glucose range (TIR). The same meta-analysis reported a significant increase in TIR by approximately 70.74 minutes per day for CGM users. This improvement was consistent across different types of diabetes and methods of insulin delivery.
CGM systems help reduce the time spent in hypoglycemia (TBR) and hyperglycemia (TAR). Studies have shown that CGM use decreases the incidence of severe hypoglycemic events and reduces glucose variability . For instance, the HypoDE study found a 72% reduction in hypoglycemic events among high-risk individuals using rtCGM.
Real-time CGM systems provide continuous glucose readings and alerts for high and low glucose levels. These systems have been particularly effective in reducing HbA1c levels and increasing TIR. A study comparing rtCGM to intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) found that rtCGM users had significantly better glycemic control, with a higher TIR and lower HbA1c levels.
Intermittently scanned CGM systems, also known as flash glucose monitoring, require users to scan the sensor to obtain glucose readings. While effective, isCGM systems have shown slightly less improvement in glycemic control compared to rtCGM. However, they still offer significant benefits over traditional SMBG, particularly in reducing the time spent in hypoglycemia.
While CGM is often associated with type 1 diabetes, it also offers benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes, especially those not using insulin. A review found that SMBG had a limited impact on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients not using insulin, suggesting that CGM could be a more effective tool for this population.
One of the main challenges with CGM systems is ensuring accuracy and ease of use. Advances in sensor technology and integration with insulin pumps are ongoing to improve these aspects. Additionally, patient education is crucial for optimizing the use of CGM systems.
The high cost of CGM devices remains a barrier to widespread adoption. Health technology assessments have shown that while CGM offers clinical benefits, the cost-effectiveness is still a concern, particularly in publicly funded healthcare systems.
Continuous glucose monitoring represents a significant advancement in diabetes management, offering improved glycemic control, increased TIR, and reduced hypoglycemia. While challenges such as cost and accuracy remain, ongoing technological advancements and patient education efforts are likely to enhance the effectiveness and accessibility of CGM systems.
Most relevant research papers on this topic