Diagnostic test for hypertension
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Diagnostic Tests for Hypertension
Introduction to Hypertension Diagnosis
Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, stroke, and kidney failure. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective management and prevention of adverse health outcomes. Various methods are employed to diagnose hypertension, including clinic-based measurements, home monitoring, kiosk-based measurements, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).
Clinic, Home, and Kiosk-Based Blood Pressure Monitoring
The BP-CHECK study compared the effectiveness of clinic, home, and kiosk-based blood pressure monitoring against the gold standard, 24-hour ABPM, for diagnosing hypertension. The study involved adults aged 18-85 with elevated blood pressure but no prior hypertension diagnosis. Participants were randomized to one of the three diagnostic regimens and subsequently completed ABPM1. The primary outcomes were the comparability and acceptability of each method compared to ABPM. This study aims to inform which diagnostic methods are most accurate, acceptable, and feasible for primary care implementation1.
Psychological Impact of Hypertension Diagnostic Testing
Undergoing hypertension diagnostic testing and receiving a diagnosis can lead to psychological distress. The BP-CHECK study also assessed the psychological impact of these processes. Participants completed psychological distress questionnaires at baseline, three weeks, and six months post-enrollment. The results indicated a short-term increase in blood pressure worry but no significant long-term impact on psychological distress2. This finding suggests that while initial anxiety may occur, the overall risk of long-term psychological distress from hypertension diagnosis is low2.
Blood Pressure Control and Diagnosis Outcomes
The BP-CHECK study further examined the effect of hypertension diagnostic testing on blood pressure control and the receipt of a hypertension diagnosis at six months. Among participants who completed ABPM, 72% were confirmed to have hypertension. However, only 47% of these participants achieved adequate blood pressure control, and 41% received a new hypertension diagnosis within six months3. These findings highlight the need for improved strategies to increase hypertension diagnosis and management in clinical practice3.
Canadian Hypertension Education Program Recommendations
The Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) provides evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and managing hypertension. Key recommendations include accurate blood pressure measurement, timely assessment of elevated readings, and the use of home and ambulatory monitoring as validated techniques for establishing a hypertension diagnosis4 7 9. The guidelines emphasize the importance of assessing cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage to determine the urgency and type of treatment required4 7 9.
Automated Detection of Hypertension
Advancements in technology have led to the development of computer-aided diagnosis systems for hypertension using physiological signals such as electrocardiography (ECG), photoplethysmography (PPG), and heart rate variability (HRV). These systems aim to provide continuous, cuffless remote monitoring of blood pressure, potentially improving early detection and management of hypertension5. Machine learning and deep learning methods based on ECG and HRV signals have shown promising results in accurately detecting hypertension5.
Conclusion
Accurate diagnosis of hypertension is essential for effective management and prevention of related health complications. Various methods, including clinic, home, and kiosk-based monitoring, as well as advanced automated systems, offer different advantages and challenges. The BP-CHECK study and CHEP guidelines provide valuable insights into the most effective and acceptable diagnostic methods. Continued research and technological advancements are crucial for improving hypertension diagnosis and management in clinical practice.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Blood pressure checks and diagnosing hypertension (BP-CHECK): Design and methods of a randomized controlled diagnostic study comparing clinic, home, kiosk, and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring.
BP-CHECK aims to determine which hypertension diagnostic methods are most accurate, acceptable, and feasible for primary care implementation.
RCT
Large Human Trial
Rigorous JournalAbstract P242: Psychological Distress Related To Hypertension Diagnostic Testing And Diagnosis
The hypertension diagnostic process increased short-term blood pressure worry but had little impact on other measures of psychological distress.
RCT
Very Rigorous JournalAbstract 134: Blood Pressure Control And Hypertension Diagnosis Six Months After Completing Ambulatory Blood Pressure Diagnostic Testing
Most individuals with high blood pressure on screening and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring did not achieve adequate blood pressure control or receive a hypertension diagnosis within 6 months.
RCTVery Rigorous JournalThe 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part 1- blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.
This paper provides updated, evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and assessing cardiovascular risk in adults with high blood pressure, emphasizing accurate blood pressure measurement and follow-up.
Systematic Review
Highly CitedAutomated Detection of Hypertension Using Physiological Signals: A Review
Machine learning and deep learning methods based on ECG and HRV signals are effective for automated detection of arterial hypertension, potentially benefiting wearable devices for remote blood pressure monitoring.
Systematic ReviewRigorous JournalDiagnosis and differential assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension is diagnosed through various investigations and a diagnostic algorithm, with acute vasoreactivity assessment being crucial for determining appropriate therapy and disease severity assessment.
Highly CitedThe 2008 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 1 - blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.
The 2008 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations emphasize accurate diagnosis, global risk assessment, and ongoing monitoring for type 2 diabetes in adults with hypertension.
Systematic ReviewHighly CitedThe 2000 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension: part two--diagnosis and assessment of people with high blood pressure.
This paper provides updated, evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and assessing high blood pressure in adults, emphasizing the importance of identifying individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular disease and implementing lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs.
Systematic ReviewThe 2009 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 1--blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.
The 2009 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations emphasize accurate diagnosis, global risk assessment, and ongoing monitoring for type 2 diabetes in adults with hypertension.
Systematic ReviewHighly CitedThe 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part 1- blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.
The 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations emphasize accurate diagnosis, ongoing reassessment, and ongoing monitoring of high normal blood pressure in adults.
Systematic Review