Difference between amlodipine and amlodipine besylate
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
Differences Between Amlodipine and Amlodipine Besylate
Introduction to Amlodipine and Amlodipine Besylate
Amlodipine is a widely used calcium channel blocker prescribed for the treatment of hypertension and angina. It is often formulated as amlodipine besylate to enhance its solubility and stability. This article explores the differences between amlodipine and its besylate salt form, focusing on their pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability.
Chemical Formulation and Solubility
Amlodipine Besylate
Amlodipine besylate is the most common form of amlodipine used in clinical practice. The besylate salt form is chosen to improve the water solubility of amlodipine, making it more effective for oral administration. This formulation has been extensively studied and used for over 17 years, demonstrating well-established efficacy and tolerability.
Other Amlodipine Salts
Recent studies have explored other salt forms of amlodipine, such as amlodipine adipate, camsylate, maleate, nicotinate, and orotate. These alternatives have been developed to potentially offer similar or improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles compared to amlodipine besylate .
Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence
Amlodipine Besylate
Amlodipine besylate has been shown to have consistent pharmacokinetic properties, with no significant differences observed between generic and original formulations in terms of absorption and bioavailability. Food intake does not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine besylate, ensuring its reliable performance in various conditions.
Comparative Studies
Studies comparing amlodipine besylate with other salt forms, such as amlodipine maleate and nicotinate, have found them to be bioequivalent. These alternative formulations exhibit similar pharmacokinetic profiles, including comparable area under the curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) values . This suggests that different salt forms of amlodipine can be used interchangeably in clinical practice without compromising efficacy or safety .
Efficacy in Hypertension Management
Amlodipine Besylate
Amlodipine besylate has been proven effective in reducing both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Its efficacy is well-documented, with significant reductions in blood pressure observed over treatment periods .
Other Amlodipine Salts
Comparative studies have shown that other amlodipine salts, such as adipate, camsylate, maleate, nicotinate, and orotate, are noninferior to amlodipine besylate in terms of blood pressure reduction. These formulations have demonstrated similar efficacy in lowering systolic and diastolic blood pressure, with response rates comparable to those of amlodipine besylate .
Tolerability and Safety Profiles
Amlodipine Besylate
The safety profile of amlodipine besylate is well-established, with common adverse events including dizziness, headache, and peripheral edema. These side effects are generally mild and manageable .
Other Amlodipine Salts
Other amlodipine salts have shown similar tolerability profiles to amlodipine besylate. Studies report no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between amlodipine besylate and other salt forms. Common adverse events remain consistent across different formulations, indicating that alternative salts are equally safe for use .
Conclusion
Amlodipine besylate remains the standard formulation for amlodipine due to its established efficacy, safety, and solubility. However, alternative salt forms such as adipate, camsylate, maleate, nicotinate, and orotate have been shown to be bioequivalent and similarly effective in managing hypertension. These alternatives offer comparable pharmacokinetic profiles and tolerability, providing flexibility in clinical practice without compromising patient outcomes.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic