Dsm 5tr
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers for "dsm 5tr"
DSM-5-TR: Implications and Changes in Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis
Introduction to DSM-5-TR and Autism Spectrum Disorder
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) represents a significant update in the classification and diagnostic criteria for various mental health conditions, including Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This article synthesizes recent research on the impact of DSM-5-TR criteria on ASD diagnosis, highlighting key findings and implications for clinical practice.
Validation of DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder
Hybrid Model for ASD Diagnosis
A study evaluating the validity of DSM-5 criteria for ASD analyzed symptoms from a large sample of siblings, both with and without ASD, using the Social Responsiveness Scale and the Social Communication Questionnaire. The research found that a hybrid model, which includes both categorical (ASD vs. non-ASD) and dimensional (social communication/interaction and restricted/repetitive behaviors) components, was the most effective in diagnosing ASD. This model showed a 90% overlap with clinical ASD diagnoses, indicating strong validity1.
Specificity and Sensitivity of DSM-5 Criteria
The DSM-5 criteria demonstrated superior specificity (0.97) compared to DSM-IV-TR (0.86), suggesting a reduction in false-positive diagnoses. However, the sensitivity was lower (0.81 vs. 0.95), potentially missing some ASD cases. Adjusting the criteria by requiring one less symptom increased sensitivity to 0.93 with minimal reduction in specificity (0.95), suggesting that a relaxed algorithm could improve ASD identification, particularly in females1.
Reliability of DSM-5 Diagnoses
Test-Retest Reliability
The DSM-5 Field Trials assessed the test-retest reliability of various diagnoses, including ASD, across multiple clinical settings in the United States and Canada. The results indicated that most diagnoses had good to very good reliability, with kappa values ranging from 0.40 to 0.79. This suggests that the DSM-5 criteria are reliable when used in typical clinical interviews2.
Impact of DSM-5 on Autism Diagnosis Rates
Decrease in ASD Diagnoses
A systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the transition from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5 criteria resulted in a significant decrease in ASD diagnoses, ranging from 7.3% to 68.4%. The pooled data showed a 31% decrease in ASD diagnoses, with the most substantial reductions observed in the subgroups of Autistic Disorder and Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS)3. Another review found that between 50% and 75% of individuals previously diagnosed under DSM-IV-TR would retain their diagnosis under DSM-5, with the greatest decreases among high-functioning individuals and those with PDD-NOS or Asperger’s Disorder4.
Opportunities for Identifying ASD Subtypes
Dimensional Approach
The DSM-5's dimensional approach to ASD diagnosis may help in identifying subtypes within the spectrum. This approach can enhance the homogeneity of research samples, making it easier to characterize and study different ASD presentations. The revised criteria provide a framework for more precise and replicable research, potentially leading to better-targeted interventions5.
Conclusion
The DSM-5-TR introduces significant changes to the diagnostic criteria for ASD, with implications for both clinical practice and research. While the new criteria improve specificity and reliability, they also result in a decrease in the number of individuals diagnosed with ASD. Adjusting the criteria to increase sensitivity could help mitigate this issue. The dimensional approach of DSM-5 offers opportunities for better understanding and identifying ASD subtypes, ultimately enhancing the quality of care and research in this field.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Validation of proposed DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder.
The proposed DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are valid and have increased specificity compared to DSM-IV-TR criteria, but a relaxed algorithm may improve identification and reduce missed cases.
Observational Study
Highly CitedDSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses.
Most DSM-5 diagnoses showed good to very good reliability in assessing symptom expression and dimensionality in representative clinical populations.
RCTHighly CitedHow Will DSM-5 Affect Autism Diagnosis? A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
DSM-5 changes may lead to a decrease in autism spectrum disorder diagnosis, particularly among the PDD-NOS subgroup.
Meta-Analysis
Rigorous JournalHighly CitedThe Effects of DSM-5 Criteria on Number of Individuals Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review
The DSM-5 criteria may lead to 50-75% of individuals maintaining diagnoses with autism spectrum disorder, with the greatest decreases in high-functioning populations with IQs over 70 and previous diagnoses of PDD-NOS or Asperger's disorder.
Systematic ReviewRigorous JournalHighly CitedDSM-5 and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs): an opportunity for identifying ASD subtypes
The DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorders can improve sample characterization and potentially identify subtypes within the disorder.
Literature Review
Very Rigorous JournalHighly CitedThe DSM‐5: Classification and criteria changes
The DSM-5 significantly revises the classification system and criteria for mental disorders, incorporating advances in neuroscience, clinical and public health needs, and enhancing international compatibility.
Highly CitedSensitivity and specificity: DSM-IV versus DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder.
The DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder show potential improvements in sensitivity and specificity, potentially identifying more individuals with pervasive developmental disorders.
The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology.
The DSM-5 personality trait model provides reasonable coverage of personality pathology, but requires further refinement to better align with research evidence and clinical authority.
Literature ReviewHighly CitedClinical Validity of DSM-5 Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment.
DSM-5 attenuated psychosis syndrome criteria have received substantial validation in recent years, but factors, neurobiological correlates, and effective treatments remain undetermined.
Systematic ReviewRigorous JournalHighly CitedDSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences—part 1: general aspects and paradigmatic discussion of depressive disorders
DSM-5 has not adopted a primarily dimensional diagnostic system, but has maintained a symptom-based, descriptive approach, with some changes to criteria for certain disorders and the introduction of transnosological specifiers.
Literature ReviewRigorous Journal