Ferrous gluconate vs ferrous sulfate
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Ferrous Gluconate vs. Ferrous Sulfate
Introduction to Iron Supplements: Ferrous Gluconate and Ferrous Sulfate
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a prevalent condition, particularly among toddlers and individuals undergoing chemotherapy. Two common iron supplements used to address IDA are ferrous gluconate (FG) and ferrous sulfate (FS). This article synthesizes research findings on the efficacy and tolerability of these two iron formulations.
Efficacy in Toddlers: Hemoglobin and Ferritin Levels
Several studies have compared the efficacy of FG and FS in improving iron status among toddlers. One study involving toddlers aged 12 to 30 months found that both FG and FS were effective in reducing iron deficiency, with FG showing a slightly better improvement in serum ferritin levels and a decrease in soluble transferrin receptors (sTfR)1. Another study with toddlers aged 6 to 24 months reported that FG supplementation led to significantly higher hemoglobin (Hb) and ferritin levels compared to FS after six months of treatment2. These findings suggest that while both supplements are effective, FG may offer a slight advantage in improving iron status markers.
Efficacy in Anemic Cancer Patients
In anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, intravenous (IV) sodium ferric gluconate (a form of FG) was found to significantly improve Hb levels compared to oral FS or no iron supplementation. The study reported a mean increase in Hb of 2.4 g/dl for FG, compared to 1.6 g/dl for oral FS and 1.5 g/dl for no iron3. This indicates that FG, particularly in its IV form, may be more effective in rapidly improving Hb levels in this patient population.
Tolerability and Side Effects
Tolerability is a crucial factor in the long-term use of iron supplements. A systematic review analyzing the tolerability of various oral iron supplements found that ferrous sulfate had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects (GAEs) compared to ferrous gluconate. Specifically, the incidence of GAEs was 30.2% for FS and 29.9% for FG, with FG being slightly better tolerated6. Another study confirmed that ferrous salt preparations, including FS and FG, are generally equally tolerable, but controlled-release formulations of FS can reduce nausea and epigastric pain4.
Conclusion
Both ferrous gluconate and ferrous sulfate are effective in treating iron deficiency anemia, with FG showing a slight edge in improving certain iron status markers and being marginally better tolerated. For specific populations, such as anemic cancer patients, IV FG may offer superior efficacy. However, the choice between FG and FS may ultimately depend on individual patient needs, tolerability, and specific clinical scenarios. Further studies are warranted to explore the long-term effectiveness and safety of these iron supplements in diverse populations.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Ferrous Gluconate and Ferrous Sulfate Added to a Complementary Food Distributed by the Mexican Nutrition Program Oportunidades Have a Comparable Efficacy to Reduce Iron Deficiency in Toddlers
Ferrous gluconate and ferrous sulfate fortification in Nutrisano toddler food both have a comparable efficacy in improving iron status and reducing anemia in toddlers.
RCTComparison of the effect of ferrous sulfate and ferrous gluconate on prophylaxis of iron deficiency in toddlers 6-24 months old: A randomized clinical trial
Ferrous gluconate supplementation is more effective than ferrous sulfate supplementation for preventing iron deficiency anemia in toddlers, with higher hemoglobin and ferritin levels.
RCT
Rigorous JournalIntravenous ferric gluconate significantly improves response to epoetin alfa versus oral iron or no iron in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Intravenous ferric gluconate significantly improves hemoglobin response in cancer patients with chemotherapy-related anemia compared to oral iron or no iron.
RCT
Highly CitedClinical inquiries. Are any oral iron formulations better tolerated than ferrous sulfate?
Ferrous sulfate remains the standard first-line treatment for iron-deficiency anemia due to its tolerability, effectiveness, and low cost.
Comparison of Ferric Sodium EDTA in Combination with Vitamin C, Folic Acid, Copper Gluconate, Zinc Gluconate, and Selenomethionine as Therapeutic Option for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Improvement in Inflammatory Status
Ferric sodium EDTA in combination with vitamin C, folic acid, copper gluconate, zinc gluconate, and selenium improves iron blood parameters and reduces inflammation in chronic kidney disease patients compared to other oral iron sources.
RCT
Very Rigorous JournalTolerability of different oral iron supplements: a systematic review
Extended-release ferrous sulfate with mucoproteose is the best tolerated oral iron supplement, with the lowest incidence of adverse effects.
Systematic ReviewHighly CitedComparative Effects between Oral Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation on Iron-Deficiency Anemia: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Lactoferrin supplementation is a superior option for improving serum iron parameters and hemoglobin levels compared to ferrous sulfate, with its anti-inflammation effect potentially explaining its efficacy.
Meta-AnalysisVery Rigorous JournalMonitoring oral iron therapy in children with iron deficiency anemia: an observational, prospective, multicenter study of AIEOP patients (Associazione Italiana Emato-Oncologia Pediatrica)
Bis-glycinate iron formulation is an acceptable alternative to ferrous iron preparations for children with iron deficiency anemia, offering a good efficacy/safety profile.
Observational StudyStabilized ferrous gluconate as iron source for food fortification
Stabilized ferrous gluconate (SFG) is a safe compound for food fortification, with iron bioavailability and acute oral toxicity comparable to ferrous sulfate.
Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation Causes Significant Gastrointestinal Side-Effects in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ferrous sulfate supplementation significantly increases the risk of gastrointestinal side-effects in adults, but the relationship with dose remains unclear.
Meta-AnalysisRigorous JournalHighly Cited