Greenhouse gas potency comparison
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Greenhouse Gas Potency: Key Comparison Metrics
Greenhouse gases (GHGs) differ in their ability to trap heat in the atmosphere, a property known as "potency." This potency is often measured using metrics like radiative forcing per molecule and global warming potential (GWP), which compare the impact of different gases over a set time period 137.
Per-Molecule Forcing and Atmospheric Concentration Effects
For a hypothetical, optically thin atmosphere, the per-molecule radiative forcing of common greenhouse gases such as water vapor (H₂O), carbon dioxide (CO₂), ozone (O₃), nitrous oxide (N₂O), and methane (CH₄) is about 10⁻²² Watts, while less common gases like carbon tetrafluoride (CF₄) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) are about 10⁻²¹ Watts per molecule . However, in the real atmosphere, the effect of abundant gases like H₂O and CO₂ is greatly reduced due to saturation, making their per-molecule impact much lower than that of less abundant gases . As a result, at current concentrations, O₃, N₂O, CH₄, CF₄, and SF₆ have two to four orders of magnitude higher per-molecule forcing than H₂O or CO₂ .
Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Policy Relevance
GWP is a widely used metric that compares the warming effect of different gases relative to CO₂ over a specific time frame, typically 20 or 100 years 37. Methane (CH₄) has a GWP over 25 times that of CO₂ over 100 years, and nitrous oxide (N₂O) is about 300 times more potent than CO₂ 510. These high GWPs mean that even small emissions of CH₄ or N₂O can have a much larger warming effect than the same amount of CO₂ 510. However, uncertainties in GWP values are significant, and alternative metrics like the forcing equivalence index (FEI) have been proposed to better align with climate stabilization goals .
Potency of Specific Greenhouse Gases
- Carbon Dioxide (CO₂): The most abundant anthropogenic GHG, but with lower per-molecule potency due to atmospheric saturation .
- Methane (CH₄): Over 25 times more potent than CO₂ per molecule over 100 years, with a much shorter atmospheric lifetime, making it a high-impact target for emission reductions 110.
- Nitrous Oxide (N₂O): About 300 times more potent than CO₂, and the third largest contributor to the greenhouse effect 15.
- Ozone (O₃), CF₄, SF₆: These gases, though present in much lower concentrations, have very high per-molecule potency, with CF₄ and SF₆ being especially strong due to their long atmospheric lifetimes and minimal saturation effects .
Implications for Emission Reduction Strategies
Because of the high potency of CH₄ and N₂O, reducing emissions of these gases can have a disproportionately large effect on slowing climate change, even if their total emissions are much lower than CO₂ 210. Policy frameworks and emission reduction strategies often prioritize these gases for this reason 23.
Conclusion
Greenhouse gases vary widely in their potency, with less abundant gases like methane, nitrous oxide, and certain industrial gases having much higher per-molecule and per-mass warming effects than carbon dioxide. While CO₂ remains the most significant GHG due to its abundance, targeting high-potency gases can yield significant climate benefits. Accurate comparison metrics and a clear understanding of each gas's role are essential for effective climate policy and mitigation efforts 13510.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic