Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that various advanced techniques, including deep learning models, digital signal processing, and noninvasive diagnostic methods, can effectively detect and manage heart blocks in ECG signals, although standard ECG may not diagnose the etiology of chronic heart block.
20 papers analyzed
Heart block, also known as atrioventricular (AV) block, is a condition where the electrical signals that control the heartbeat are partially or completely blocked from reaching the ventricles. This can lead to various degrees of heart block, which can be detected and analyzed using an electrocardiogram (ECG). An ECG is a non-invasive test that records the electrical activity of the heart and is crucial for diagnosing cardiac abnormalities, including heart blocks .
First-degree heart block is characterized by a prolonged PR interval on the ECG, indicating a delay in the conduction of electrical impulses from the atria to the ventricles. Second-degree heart block is further divided into Type I (Wenckebach) and Type II. Type I shows a progressive lengthening of the PR interval until a beat is dropped, while Type II is marked by occasional dropped beats without PR interval prolongation.
Third-degree heart block, or complete heart block, is the total dissociation of atrial and ventricular activity. The ECG shows more P waves than QRS complexes, with no relationship between them. The ventricular rate is typically slower than the atrial rate, and the QRS complexes can be narrow or wide depending on the location of the escape rhythm. This condition often requires permanent pacing as treatment.
Traditional ECG analysis involves examining various parameters such as atrial and ventricular rates, Q-Tc interval, QRS morphology and duration, and abnormalities in ST-T segments. However, standard ECG alone is often insufficient to diagnose the etiology of chronic heart block or the presence of significant myocardial disease.
Recent advancements in digital signal processing have improved the detection and characterization of heart blocks. Techniques such as periodogram power spectrum and spectrogram time-frequency analysis can differentiate between normal and heart block subjects by analyzing ECG variations. These methods provide a more detailed characterization of ECG parameters, aiding in more accurate diagnosis .
Unsupervised anomaly detection using deep convolutional autoencoders (CAE) has shown promise in identifying arrhythmogenic rhythms in AV block patients. These models can detect anomalies such as atrial fibrillation (AF), premature ventricular contraction (PVC), and ventricular tachycardia (VT) with high sensitivity and specificity. This approach is particularly useful for long-term monitoring and clinical decision-making in AV block patients.
Electrophysiological studies (EPS) are used to predict the likelihood of complete heart block in patients with syncope and bundle branch block. However, the negative predictive value (NPV) of EPS is relatively low, suggesting that its use should be reconsidered in clinical practice.
Complete heart block can complicate acute myocardial infarctions (AMI), occurring in about 10% of cases. This condition represents a significant clinical challenge and often requires immediate intervention, such as the insertion of a transvenous pacemaker.
ECG remains a fundamental tool in diagnosing and managing heart block. While traditional ECG analysis provides essential information, advanced techniques like digital signal processing and unsupervised anomaly detection offer enhanced diagnostic capabilities. Understanding the various types of heart block and their ECG characteristics is crucial for effective clinical management and improving patient outcomes.
Most relevant research papers on this topic