Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
Some studies suggest that various factors such as pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, systolic blood pressure, norepinephrine levels, ejection fraction, and BNP levels are strong predictors of heart failure prognosis, while other studies highlight the need for improved prognostic models and communication between patients and physicians.
20 papers analyzed
Heart failure (HF) remains a significant health challenge with a generally poor prognosis despite advances in medical and surgical management. Prognostic assessment in HF is complex due to the multitude of factors influencing outcomes, ranging from hemodynamic variables to biochemical markers and psychological factors .
Among hemodynamic factors, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) have been identified as significant predictors of prognosis in HF patients. Higher PCWP and lower SBP are associated with poorer outcomes, while cardiac output (CI) does not independently predict prognosis. This highlights the importance of monitoring these specific hemodynamic parameters in clinical practice.
BNP and NT-proBNP are crucial biochemical markers used to estimate prognosis in chronic stable HF. Elevated levels of these peptides are strongly associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. These markers help clinicians stratify patients based on their risk and guide treatment decisions accordingly.
Cardiac norepinephrine spillover is another potent predictor of outcomes in HF. It reflects systemic adrenergic activity and has been shown to be a strong indicator of prognosis, although its measurement is less commonly available compared to plasma norepinephrine levels.
LVEF is a well-established predictor of prognosis, particularly in patients with moderate HF. However, its predictive value diminishes in advanced HF with low LVEF. Metabolic exercise performance, measured by peak oxygen consumption, is a robust predictor of outcomes across different severities of HF .
Advanced age is a powerful demographic predictor of poor prognosis in HF. Additionally, the presence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias significantly increases mortality risk.
Depression and social support are psychological factors that can influence the prognosis of HF patients. Studies have shown that depressive symptoms are associated with worse outcomes, particularly in outpatient settings. Social support also plays a role, although the evidence is less consistent compared to depression.
There is often a significant discrepancy between HF patients' and their physicians' estimates of prognosis. Patients tend to be more optimistic about their life expectancy compared to their clinicians. This non-concordance highlights the need for improved communication and serious illness conversation training to align patient and physician expectations better.
The prognosis of heart failure is influenced by a complex interplay of hemodynamic, biochemical, functional, demographic, and psychological factors. Key predictors include PCWP, SBP, BNP, NT-proBNP, LVEF, age, and the presence of ventricular arrhythmias. Addressing the discrepancies in prognostic estimates between patients and physicians through better communication can also improve the management and outcomes of HF. Despite advancements, HF continues to be associated with high mortality, underscoring the need for ongoing research and improved therapeutic strategies.
Most relevant research papers on this topic