Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
Some studies suggest hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) benefits wound healing, traumatic brain injuries, and quality of life in certain cancer patients, while other studies indicate its effectiveness and safety remain inconclusive for various conditions.
20 papers analyzed
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has shown significant benefits in the treatment of chronic wounds, particularly diabetic foot ulcers. Studies indicate that HBOT can enhance the rate of ulcer healing in the short term, although these benefits may not persist in the long term. Specifically, pooled data from multiple trials demonstrated an increased rate of ulcer healing at six weeks but not at one year. Additionally, HBOT has been found to significantly reduce the size of chronic leg ulcers over a six-week period. However, the evidence is not conclusive for other types of ulcers, such as venous, arterial, and pressure ulcers, indicating a need for further research.
HBOT has been explored as a treatment for traumatic brain injuries (TBI), with mixed results. While some studies have shown that HBOT can improve cognitive functioning and alleviate symptoms by increasing oxygen delivery to damaged brain tissue, the results have not been consistently replicated across all trials . The variability in outcomes may be due to differences in study design and the complexity of brain injuries. Nonetheless, effect size analyses suggest a clinically significant benefit, although placebo effects may account for a portion of the observed improvements.
HBOT has been used to manage radiation-induced complications in patients with head and neck cancer. Evidence suggests that HBOT can improve subjective symptoms such as xerostomia (dry mouth), swallowing difficulties, and overall quality of life. However, there is no conclusive evidence that HBOT improves dental implant survival, prevents osteonecrosis, or enhances salivary gland function. The high costs and limited accessibility of HBOT must be considered when evaluating its potential benefits for these patients.
The use of HBOT for chronic bowel dysfunction following pelvic radiotherapy has been investigated, but results are inconclusive. A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial found no significant differences in bowel function or rectal bleeding scores between the HBOT and control groups. This suggests that HBOT may not provide substantial benefits for patients with radiation-induced chronic gastrointestinal symptoms.
In a small pilot study, HBOT showed promise as an adjunctive therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) flares requiring hospitalization. Patients treated with HBOT had higher rates of clinical remission and a reduced need for second-line therapies, such as colectomy or biologic treatments, compared to those receiving sham treatment. Although these findings are encouraging, larger, well-powered trials are necessary to confirm the therapeutic benefits of HBOT for UC.
HBOT is also utilized in plastic and reconstructive surgery for conditions such as compromised flaps and grafts, and ischemia-reperfusion injuries. The therapy works by generating reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, which play a crucial role in cell signaling and tissue repair. While animal studies and a limited number of clinical trials support the use of HBOT in these contexts, further research is needed to establish its efficacy and refine patient selection criteria.
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy offers several potential benefits across a range of medical conditions, from chronic wound healing to traumatic brain injury and radiation-induced complications. However, the evidence is mixed, and further research is needed to fully understand its efficacy and optimize its use. The high costs and accessibility issues associated with HBOT also warrant careful consideration when evaluating its potential benefits for individual patients.
Most relevant research papers on this topic