Iq test practice effects
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Practice Effects on IQ Test Scores
Practice effects refer to the improvement in IQ test scores that occurs when individuals take the same or similar tests multiple times. This phenomenon is well-documented and has important implications for interpreting IQ results.
Magnitude and Pattern of Practice Effects in IQ Testing
Research shows that practice effects are most pronounced after the first retest, with subsequent retests yielding smaller gains. For example, adults with average and high-average initial IQs showed greater score increases across repeated administrations of the WAIS-R compared to those with lower initial IQs, especially at the first retest. Performance IQ scores tend to improve more than Verbal IQ scores, particularly during the initial retest period . In children, retesting after six months led to significant increases in Performance and Full Scale IQ scores (8 and 5 points, respectively), while Verbal IQ scores remained relatively stable .
Individual Differences in Practice Effects
Not everyone benefits equally from repeated IQ testing. Individuals with higher initial IQs tend to show greater gains from practice than those with lower initial scores, suggesting that practice effects may amplify existing differences in cognitive ability—sometimes described as "the rich get richer" . This pattern highlights the importance of considering baseline ability when interpreting changes in IQ scores over time.
Practice Effects, Coaching, and the g Factor
Studies examining the relationship between practice, coaching, and the general intelligence factor (g) indicate that practice and coaching can reduce the g-loadedness of IQ tests. While practice does not necessarily make highly g-loaded tests less susceptible to improvement, coaching does. This means that repeated exposure and targeted preparation can change what IQ tests measure, potentially reducing their predictive validity and practical usability .
Practice Effects Versus Real Cognitive Change
It is important to distinguish between practice effects and genuine changes in cognitive functioning. In clinical populations, such as epilepsy patients, improvements in IQ test scores over time may reflect real changes in psychological functioning rather than just practice effects. For these individuals, test-retest gains often correspond with improvements in other neuropsychological measures and health status, suggesting that not all score increases are due to repeated exposure to the test .
Broader Implications of Practice Effects
The widespread use of standardized testing in education and society may contribute to overall increases in IQ scores, a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect. Regular testing provides practice in the skills measured by IQ tests, which can lead to higher scores over time. While some view practice effects as a limitation of IQ testing, others argue that improvement through practice is a natural part of skill development, including cognitive abilities .
Conclusion
Practice effects are a significant factor in IQ testing, leading to higher scores with repeated test exposure, especially after the first retest and among individuals with higher initial IQs. These effects can alter the interpretation of IQ scores, reduce the g-loadedness of tests, and may be confounded with real cognitive changes in clinical populations. Understanding and accounting for practice effects is essential for accurate assessment and interpretation of IQ test results 12345.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic