Is spacetime real
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Is Spacetime Real?
The Block Universe and Evolving Spacetime
The concept of spacetime as a fixed entity, often referred to as the Block Universe, suggests that time is an illusion and the universe exists as a static whole. This view is grounded in time-reversible microphysical laws but fails to account for the time-irreversible macro-physical behaviors and the development of complex systems, such as life. When these factors are considered, the Block Universe model is better replaced by an evolving block universe, where spacetime itself evolves as time progresses. This evolving model posits that the future's potential becomes the past's certainty, without any preferred surfaces in spacetime, but rather through the evolution of proper time along world lines .
Supersubstantivalism and the Nature of Spacetime
Supersubstantivalism is a perspective in the metaphysics of spacetime that posits spacetime as the only kind of substance. This view suggests that what we perceive as material objects are actually parts of spacetime instantiating certain properties. There are two forms of this view: monist, where spacetime is the single independent substance, and pluralistic, where parts of spacetime are ontologically prior to the whole. An alternative formulation, non-mereological pluralistic supersubstantivalism, argues that both spacetime and material objects are real substances, irreducible to each other, yet fundamentally the same type .
Quantum Gravity and Spacetime Emergence
Theories of quantum gravity often imply that spacetime is not fundamental but emerges from a more basic, non-spatiotemporal reality. This raises the issue of empirical coherence: how can a non-spatiotemporal theory produce spatiotemporal evidence? Solutions to this problem can be realist or antirealist. Realist approaches, particularly role-functionalism, suggest that our everyday concepts of space and time reveal aspects of the true nature of emergent spacetime. This perspective is conceptually plausible and suitable for addressing the coherence problem 456.
Relationalism vs. Substantivalism
The debate between relationalism and substantivalism concerns whether spacetime is a substance in its own right (substantivalism) or merely a set of relations among material objects (relationalism). This debate is complex and context-dependent, with different investigative contexts yielding inconsistent results. Some argue that focusing on pragmatic issues of physicality, rather than ontological character, is more fruitful. This approach considers various explications of physicality, all of philosophical interest, without privileging any a priori .
Conclusion
The reality of spacetime is a multifaceted question that intersects with various philosophical and physical theories. While the Block Universe model suggests a static spacetime, the evolving block universe model accounts for the dynamic nature of time. Supersubstantivalism offers a perspective where spacetime and material objects are fundamentally the same, yet distinct. Quantum gravity theories challenge the fundamentality of spacetime, proposing its emergence from non-spatiotemporal structures. The relationalism vs. substantivalism debate further complicates the issue, suggesting that the nature of spacetime may depend on the context of investigation. Thus, the question of whether spacetime is real remains open, with compelling arguments on multiple fronts.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Stationary spacetimes with time-dependent real scalar fields
This paper extends the static solution of the Einstein-Klein-Gordon equations to rotating solutions, investigates nonminimally coupled time-dependent real scalar fields on static black holes, and proves a no-hair theorem for stealth scalar fields on the Schwarzs
Spacetime is as spacetime does
Quantum gravity theories must establish how relativistic spacetime emerges from non-spatiotemporal structures, focusing on functionally relevant features for empirical evidence.
DOI