Krill oil versus fish oil
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Krill Oil Versus Fish Oil: A Comparative Analysis
Bioavailability of EPA and DHA
Higher Bioavailability in Krill Oil
Krill oil (KO) and fish oil (FO) are both rich sources of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), but their bioavailability differs. Studies indicate that the bioavailability of EPA and DHA from krill oil is higher than that from fish oil. This is attributed to the phospholipid form of omega-3 fatty acids in krill oil, which is more efficiently absorbed compared to the triglyceride form found in fish oil 148. For instance, a study showed that krill oil resulted in a significantly greater relative area under the curve (relAUC) for plasma EPA after 30 days compared to fish oil .
Lipid-Modifying Effects
Similar Impact on Lipid Levels
Despite the differences in bioavailability, the lipid-modifying effects of krill oil and fish oil are largely similar. A network meta-analysis found no significant differences between krill oil and fish oil in terms of their effects on triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and total cholesterol . Both oils were effective in lowering triglyceride levels, but the extent of reduction was dose-dependent on the n-3 fatty acids consumed .
Omega-3 Index and Inflammatory Markers
Enhanced Omega-3 Index with Krill Oil
Krill oil has been shown to be more effective than fish oil in increasing the omega-3 index, which is a measure of EPA and DHA levels in red blood cells (RBCs). This increase is likely due to the higher bioavailability of krill oil . Additionally, krill oil was found to reduce the n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio more effectively than fish oil, which is beneficial for reducing inflammation and cardiovascular disease risk .
Inflammatory Markers
The effects of krill oil and fish oil on inflammatory markers are mixed. Some studies report limited effects on lipids and inflammatory markers in both human and animal studies . However, krill oil has been shown to modulate lipid metabolism more effectively, potentially due to its phospholipid content, which may influence inflammation differently compared to fish oil .
Plasma Lipidome and Molecular Species
Differential Effects on Plasma Lipidome
Krill oil and fish oil have different effects on the plasma lipidome. A study found that krill oil resulted in a significantly greater increase in certain lipid molecular species compared to fish oil. Specifically, more than 38% of the lipid species that increased with krill oil contained omega-3 PUFA, whereas only 12% of the lipid species that increased with fish oil contained omega-3 PUFA . This suggests that krill oil may have unique biological effects that are not replicated by fish oil.
Nutritional and Toxicological Profiles
Contaminant Levels
Both krill oil and fish oil are subject to contamination by persistent organic pollutants (POPs). However, krill oil products generally adhere closely to EPA and DHA manufacturer specifications and contain intermediate levels of POP contaminants compared to various fish oil products . This makes krill oil a potentially safer option in terms of toxin exposure.
Conclusion
In summary, while both krill oil and fish oil are effective sources of omega-3 fatty acids, krill oil appears to have higher bioavailability and may be more effective in increasing the omega-3 index and modulating lipid metabolism. However, the lipid-modifying effects of both oils are similar, and more research is needed to fully understand their differential impacts on health.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic