Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
Some studies suggest that trimetazidine, ivabradine, ranolazine, and perhexiline are effective in reducing angina symptoms and nitroglycerin use, while other studies emphasize the need for personalized, multi-drug regimens and highlight the uncertainty in the effectiveness of some drugs like ranolazine.
20 papers analyzed
Angina pectoris, commonly known as angina, is a symptom of myocardial ischemia, typically caused by obstructive coronary artery disease. It manifests as chest pain or discomfort, often triggered by physical exertion or stress. The primary goal of angina treatment is to alleviate symptoms, improve quality of life, and prevent adverse cardiovascular events.
Beta blockers and calcium channel blockers are the cornerstone of initial angina treatment. Beta blockers reduce myocardial oxygen demand by lowering heart rate and contractility, while calcium channel blockers alleviate ischemia through vasodilation and decreased myocardial contractility . These medications are often prescribed together with short-acting nitrates for immediate relief of angina attacks.
Trimetazidine is a metabolic agent that improves myocardial glucose utilization, thereby reducing ischemia. Studies have shown that trimetazidine effectively reduces the frequency of angina attacks and nitroglycerin consumption, and improves exercise tolerance compared to placebo . It is generally well-tolerated and may result in fewer adverse events compared to other anti-anginal agents . However, it is not widely included in clinical guidelines and requires further large-scale trials to establish its role in angina management .
Ranolazine is another second-line agent that works by inhibiting the late sodium current in cardiac cells, thereby reducing intracellular calcium overload and myocardial oxygen consumption. It has been shown to reduce the frequency of angina episodes and improve exercise performance. However, its effects on mortality and major cardiovascular events remain uncertain, and it is associated with an increased risk of non-serious adverse events.
Nicorandil combines nitrate-like vasodilation with potassium channel activation, providing dual benefits in angina management. Ivabradine selectively inhibits the If current in the sinoatrial node, reducing heart rate without affecting contractility. Perhexiline, though less commonly used, has shown efficacy in patients with refractory angina, particularly those unsuitable for revascularization procedures .
Recent research has focused on developing new anti-anginal agents and optimizing combination therapies. Investigational drugs such as fasudil, a Rho-kinase inhibitor, and various gene and cell-based therapies are being explored for their potential to provide additional symptomatic relief and improve outcomes in patients with chronic stable angina .
Given the heterogeneity of angina patients, a personalized approach to treatment is advocated. This involves tailoring therapy based on individual patient characteristics, comorbidities, and the underlying pathophysiology of their angina. Combining multiple agents with complementary mechanisms of action may offer enhanced efficacy and better symptom control.
The management of angina pectoris involves a combination of lifestyle modifications, pharmacotherapy, and, in some cases, revascularization procedures. While beta blockers and calcium channel blockers remain the mainstay of initial treatment, second-line agents like trimetazidine, ranolazine, nicorandil, ivabradine, and perhexiline provide valuable options for patients who do not respond adequately to first-line therapies. Ongoing research and personalized treatment strategies hold promise for further improving the management of this common and debilitating condition.
Most relevant research papers on this topic