Searched over 200M research papers for "molar anatomy"
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest molar anatomy varies significantly in root number and canal morphology, influenced by factors such as ethnicity, age, and species, with distinct differences between maxillary and mandibular molars.
20 papers analyzed
The root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar present significant clinical challenges in endodontic therapy. A systematic review of 41 studies involving 18,781 teeth revealed that the incidence of a third root in these molars is 13%, with a strong correlation to the ethnicity of the population studied. The majority of these teeth (61.3%) have three canals, while 35.7% have four canals, and about 1% have five canals. The mesial root typically has two canals in 94.4% of cases and three canals in 2.3%, with the most common canal system configuration being Vertucci type IV (52.3%) and type II (35%). The distal root predominantly exhibits a type I configuration in 62.7% of cases, followed by types II (14.5%) and IV (12.4%).
Maxillary C-shaped molars, although rare, exhibit high anatomical complexity. An observational study using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) technology on 2,227 teeth from 895 patients identified five different types of C-shaped molars. The global prevalence was found to be 1.1% for first molars and 3.8% for second molars. These C-shaped configurations include various fusions between the mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatal roots, highlighting the need for a thorough understanding of their anatomy for proper treatment.
The maxillary first molar typically has three roots in 95.9% of cases, with a small percentage (3.9%) having two roots. Fusion of any two or three roots occurs in approximately 5.2% of cases. The mesiobuccal root often contains two canals in 56.8% of cases, while the distobuccal and palatal roots usually have one canal in 98.3% and over 99% of cases, respectively. This data underscores the importance of recognizing the variability in canal morphology for effective endodontic treatment.
A study on the root canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars from an Irish population revealed that 11% of first molars and 43% of second molars had fused roots. The mesiobuccal roots of these molars frequently contained two canals (78% in first molars and 58% in second molars). Additionally, the occurrence of two canals and transverse anastomoses decreased significantly with age, indicating that younger patients may present more complex canal systems.
Geometric morphometric analysis of hominin lower molars shows that shape variability increases from first to second and third molars. First molars tend to retain a stable 5-cusped conformation, while second and third molars exhibit marked distal reductions in later Homo species. This trend suggests a correlated reduction of distal areas across the postcanine dentition, with significant implications for understanding hominin evolution.
The anatomy of third molars is highly variable and often unpredictable. A study of 150 maxillary and 150 mandibular third molars found that 17% of mandibular molars had one root, 77% had two roots, 5% had three roots, and 1% had four roots. Maxillary molars showed similar variability, with 15% having one root, 32% having two roots, 45% having three roots, and 7% having four roots. The number of canals also varied widely, with some teeth exhibiting up to six canals .
Understanding the complex anatomy of molars, including the variability in root and canal configurations, is crucial for successful endodontic treatment. The prevalence of additional roots and canals, as well as the unique configurations such as C-shaped molars, necessitates advanced diagnostic approaches and clinical skills. This comprehensive overview highlights the importance of recognizing these anatomical variations to improve treatment outcomes.
Most relevant research papers on this topic
36 Citations