Searched over 200M research papers
8 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that the normal range for non-HDL cholesterol may vary based on age, sex, and population, and that non-HDL cholesterol is a significant marker for cardiovascular risk, potentially more so than LDL cholesterol alone, but its predictive value may differ when compared to other lipid measures like total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio, especially in specific groups such as those with type 2 diabetes or high triglycerides.
20 papers analyzed
Non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is a critical marker for assessing cardiovascular risk. It includes all cholesterol contained in lipoprotein particles that are considered atherogenic, such as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL). Unlike LDL-C, non-HDL-C provides a more comprehensive measure of all potentially harmful cholesterol particles.
In a large-scale study involving 1.3 million U.S. adults, non-HDL-C values corresponding to LDL-C cutpoints were identified. For instance, LDL-C cutpoints of 70, 100, 130, 160, and 190 mg/dL matched non-HDL-C values of 93, 125, 157, 190, and 223 mg/dL, respectively. This study suggests that non-HDL-C cutpoints are generally 30 mg/dL higher than LDL-C cutpoints.
A study focusing on Japanese children and adolescents found that the mean non-HDL-C level was 105.7 mg/dL, with boys averaging 103.0 mg/dL and girls 108.2 mg/dL. The 75th percentile for boys ranged from 113 to 120 mg/dL, while for girls, it was around 122 mg/dL. The 95th percentile was approximately 140 mg/dL for boys and 150 mg/dL for girls.
In a Venezuelan population study, the median non-HDL-C was 143 mg/dL, with no significant difference between men and women. Non-HDL-C levels between 130-159 mg/dL and ≥160 mg/dL were associated with a higher risk of multiple atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk factors.
Non-HDL-C is considered a superior predictor of cardiovascular risk compared to LDL-C, especially in individuals with high triglyceride levels. Studies have shown that non-HDL-C better reflects the presence of small-dense LDL particles, which are more atherogenic. This makes non-HDL-C a valuable tool for risk stratification and management in clinical practice.
Current guidelines suggest that non-HDL-C cutpoints for high-risk patients may need to be lowered to match the percentiles of LDL-C cutpoints. This adjustment could lead to a significant reclassification of patients into higher treatment categories, thereby improving risk assessment and treatment outcomes.
Non-HDL cholesterol is a crucial marker for assessing cardiovascular risk, with normal ranges varying by age, sex, and population. It provides a more comprehensive measure of atherogenic cholesterol compared to LDL-C, making it a valuable tool in both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Understanding and utilizing the appropriate non-HDL-C cutpoints can significantly enhance patient care and outcomes.
Most relevant research papers on this topic