Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that non-HDL cholesterol levels are a reliable marker for cardiovascular risk, more closely associated with atherogenic lipoproteins, vascular inflammation, and long-term cardiovascular outcomes than LDL cholesterol levels.
20 papers analyzed
Non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) has been shown to be a superior predictor of small-dense LDL cholesterol (sdLDL-C) compared to LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) in Japanese subjects with triglyceride (TG) levels below 400 mg/dL. The correlation coefficient of non-HDL-C for sdLDL-C was significantly higher than that of LDL-C, indicating a stronger relationship. This suggests that non-HDL-C is a more reliable surrogate marker for sdLDL-C, which is known to be more atherogenic.
Non-HDL-C levels are closely associated with changes in coronary atheroma volume, more so than LDL-C levels. Lower on-treatment non-HDL-C levels are linked to significant regression in percent atheroma volume (PAV), indicating a reduction in plaque buildup within the arteries. This association holds true across various levels of LDL-C and C-reactive protein, and irrespective of diabetic status, highlighting the importance of non-HDL-C in managing coronary artery disease.
Elevated non-HDL-C levels in young adulthood are predictive of high non-HDL-C levels later in life, which in turn are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Individuals with high non-HDL-C levels early in life have a significantly higher risk of developing CVD over the next 25 years compared to those with lower levels. This underscores the importance of early lipid monitoring and intervention to mitigate long-term cardiovascular risk.
Non-HDL-C levels in adolescence are strong predictors of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) in adulthood. Elevated non-HDL-C levels during early life stages are linked to a higher cumulative risk of ASCVD, emphasizing the need for early preventive measures to manage lipid levels and reduce future cardiovascular risk.
A combination of nutraceuticals, including berberine, red yeast rice, and chitosan, has been shown to significantly lower non-HDL-C levels in individuals with dyslipidemia. This intervention also reduces LDL-C and apolipoprotein B levels, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic strategy for primary prevention in dyslipidemic individuals.
Non-HDL-C is a reliable early predictor of vascular inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. It shows a significant correlation with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, a marker of inflammation, and the cholesterol retention fraction (CRF). This indicates that non-HDL-C can be a practical marker for early detection and management of vascular inflammation.
Non-HDL-C, along with total cholesterol (TC), can be used to predict abnormal LDL levels in apparently healthy populations. This method provides a reliable alternative for estimating LDL levels, especially in settings where direct measurement may not be feasible.
In patients with stable coronary artery disease, non-HDL-C is more relevant to atherogenic lipoprotein subfractions compared to LDL-C. It shows stronger correlations with small LDL particles and mean LDL particle size, supporting its use as a better marker for assessing cardiovascular risk.
In hypertensive populations, non-HDL-C levels exhibit a U-shaped association with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Both very low and very high levels of non-HDL-C are associated with increased mortality risk, suggesting the need for maintaining optimal non-HDL-C levels to reduce mortality risk.
Non-HDL-C is a better predictor of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Higher non-HDL-C levels are associated with increased risk of PMI, highlighting its importance in preprocedural risk assessment and management.
Non-HDL cholesterol is a valuable marker for predicting cardiovascular risk, atheroma progression, and vascular inflammation. Its superior predictive value over LDL-C in various contexts underscores the need for its inclusion in routine lipid monitoring and management strategies. Early intervention and maintenance of optimal non-HDL-C levels can significantly reduce long-term cardiovascular risk and improve patient outcomes.
Most relevant research papers on this topic