Planetary order and size comparison
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Planetary Order and Size Patterns in Exoplanetary Systems
Peas-in-a-Pod: Size Uniformity and Regular Spacing
Many studies have found that planets within the same exoplanetary system often have similar sizes and are regularly spaced, a trend known as the "peas-in-a-pod" phenomenon. This means that if you look at a system with several planets, the planets tend to be close in size and are spaced at regular intervals from their star. This pattern is seen both in observed systems and in computer simulations, suggesting it is a natural result of how planets form and not just a result of how we detect them 158. The similarity in size and spacing is especially strong for super-Earths and sub-Neptunes, and is even more pronounced in systems where planets are near orbital resonances .
Size Ordering: Inner vs. Outer Planets
When comparing the order of planet sizes within a system, there is a tendency for the outer planet to be larger than the inner one, especially when at least one of the planets is Neptune-sized or larger. In these cases, about two-thirds of the time, the inner planet is smaller than the outer planet. However, for pairs of planets that are both smaller than Neptune, there is no clear pattern in size order 25. Some studies suggest that this size ordering may be influenced by processes like photo-evaporation, which can shrink inner planets more than outer ones due to higher stellar radiation .
Exceptions and Detection Biases
Not all systems follow these patterns. For example, planets that fall into the "radius gap" (between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes) often break the peas-in-a-pod trend and can even show reverse size ordering, where the inner planet is larger than the outer one. These systems also tend to have planets in orbital resonances more often than others, suggesting different formation or evolutionary processes may be at play, such as giant impacts .
Some researchers argue that the observed patterns of size similarity and ordering could be partly due to detection biases. The way we find planets (mainly by the transit method) makes it easier to detect planets of similar size and spacing, which could exaggerate these trends. When these biases are accounted for, the evidence for strong size ordering and uniformity becomes weaker, and the properties of planets in the same system may be more independent than previously thought .
Mass-Radius Relationship and Size Breakpoints
There is a clear distinction between "small" and "large" planets based on their mass and radius. The transition between these two groups occurs at about 124 Earth masses and 12.1 Earth radii. Small planets (like super-Earths and sub-Neptunes) follow a different mass-radius relationship than large, gas giant planets. This breakpoint is linked to the planet's composition, with larger planets being mostly hydrogen and helium .
Visual Size Comparisons in the Solar System
Photographic catalogs and visual studies of our own solar system provide direct size comparisons between planets and moons, showing the vast differences in planetary sizes. These visual resources help illustrate the scale differences, from small rocky planets like Mercury to gas giants like Jupiter 469.
Conclusion
In summary, planets within the same system often have similar sizes and regular spacing, especially for super-Earths and sub-Neptunes, and there is a tendency for outer planets to be larger when at least one is Neptune-sized or bigger. However, exceptions exist, particularly for planets in the radius gap, and detection biases may influence some observed trends. The mass-radius relationship further divides planets into small and large categories, reflecting differences in their composition. Visual comparisons in our solar system highlight the dramatic range in planetary sizes.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic