Planetary size comparison
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Visual and Photographic Planetary Size Comparison
Accurate planetary size comparisons have been made possible through photographs taken by NASA spacecraft over the past several decades. These images display global views of planets and moons at the same scale, allowing for direct visual comparison of their sizes and prominent surface features. When original spacecraft photos are unavailable, line drawings or artist renderings are used to maintain consistency in scale. This approach enables both scientists and educators to study the relative sizes of planets and moons visually and to compare specific geographical features across different worlds using the same scale for reference Meszaros1983Meszaros1991Meszaros1985.
Planetary Size Distribution in the Solar System
Photographic catalogs and cartographic products have been instrumental in illustrating the size relationships among the planets and moons in our solar system. These resources show that the planets vary greatly in size, from small rocky bodies like Mercury to gas giants like Jupiter. The ability to compare these bodies at the same scale provides a clear understanding of the vast differences in planetary dimensions within our solar system Meszaros1983Meszaros1991Meszaros1985.
Exoplanet Size Patterns: "Peas in a Pod" Phenomenon
Studies of exoplanetary systems, particularly those discovered by the Kepler mission, reveal that planets within the same multi-planet system often have similar sizes. This "peas in a pod" pattern means that planets orbiting the same star are more likely to be similar in size to each other than to a random planet from another system. This uniformity is especially strong in systems where planets are near orbital resonance, but it is also present in nonresonant systems, suggesting common formation or evolutionary processes Weiss2017Goyal2023Otegi2021.
Size Uniformity and System Architecture
Research shows that the size similarity among planets in the same system is more pronounced for planets smaller than about 10 Earth radii and less massive than about 100 Earth masses. For larger planets, this uniformity decreases. Additionally, in most multi-planet systems, the outer planet tends to be larger than the inner one, and the size ratio between neighboring planets is often linked to differences in their temperatures, possibly due to atmospheric loss processes like photo-evaporation Weiss2017Goyal2023Otegi2021+1 MORE.
Planet Size Distribution and Gaps
The distribution of exoplanet sizes is not uniform. There is a notable gap between rocky super-Earths and gas-rich sub-Neptunes, with fewer planets found in this size range. This gap is influenced by factors such as the planet's distance from its star and the mass of the host star, which affect the planet's exposure to stellar radiation and subsequent atmospheric loss. For lower-mass stars, the entire size distribution shifts to smaller sizes, indicating that smaller stars tend to form smaller planets Fulton2018Borucki2011.
Size Differences in Single vs. Multiple Planet Systems
Comparisons between planets in single-transiting systems and those in compact multiple-transiting systems show that, on average, planets in compact multiple systems are larger than those in single systems, especially for planets smaller than six Earth radii. This difference cannot be explained by detection bias and may be related to differences in planetary formation or evolution in these systems .
Conclusion
Planetary size comparison, both within our solar system and among exoplanetary systems, reveals significant diversity and intriguing patterns. Visual and photographic methods provide clear, direct comparisons of planetary sizes, while statistical studies of exoplanets show that planets in the same system often have similar sizes, especially for smaller planets. The presence of size gaps and differences between single and multiple planet systems further highlights the complexity of planetary formation and evolution.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic