Practice effects on iq test performance
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Practice Effects on IQ Test Performance: Overview
Practice effects refer to improvements in IQ test scores that occur simply because individuals have taken the test before, rather than due to actual changes in intelligence. These effects are important to understand, especially in repeated testing situations, as they can influence the interpretation of cognitive assessments.
Magnitude and Pattern of Practice Effects in IQ Testing
Research consistently shows that practice effects are most pronounced during the first few retests, with the largest gains typically occurring between the first and second test administrations. After this initial improvement, further gains tend to plateau or become much smaller in subsequent retests 156. This pattern has been observed in both adults and children, across various cognitive and IQ test batteries 356.
Differential Impact on IQ Subscales
Practice effects do not impact all aspects of IQ tests equally. Performance IQ scores tend to show greater improvements with repeated testing compared to Verbal IQ scores 13. This suggests that certain types of cognitive tasks, especially those involving problem-solving or perceptual-motor skills, are more susceptible to practice-related gains.
Influence of Initial IQ Level
Individuals with higher initial IQ scores tend to benefit more from practice effects than those with lower initial scores. In studies where participants were grouped by their initial Full Scale IQ, those in the Average and High-Average groups made greater gains across retest intervals compared to those in the Low-Average group . This indicates that practice effects may amplify existing differences in cognitive ability, with the "rich getting richer."
Role of Test Frequency and Duration
The frequency and timing of test administrations also influence the magnitude of practice effects. High-frequency testing (e.g., multiple times within a short period) leads to more pronounced practice effects early on, with performance stabilizing after several sessions. When testing is spaced out over longer intervals, the effects are still present but may be less dramatic 56.
Practice Effects, Coaching, and g-Loadedness
Practice and coaching can both improve IQ test performance, but their effects on the underlying general intelligence factor (g) differ. While coaching tends to reduce the g-loadedness of test scores, practice effects do not necessarily make highly g-loaded tests less susceptible to improvement. Both practice and coaching, however, can reduce the predictive validity of IQ tests if not properly accounted for .
Confounding Factors: Motivation and Strategy
Individual differences in motivation and test-taking strategies can also drive variation in IQ test performance. For example, some individuals may choose to spend more time on difficult items, which can significantly affect their scores and contribute to observed practice effects . This highlights the importance of considering non-cognitive factors when interpreting changes in IQ test results over time.
Conclusion
Practice effects are a robust phenomenon in IQ testing, with the largest gains occurring early in repeated testing and greater improvements seen in Performance IQ and among individuals with higher initial IQ scores. These effects can complicate the interpretation of longitudinal cognitive assessments, making it essential to account for them in both research and clinical settings. Understanding the timing, magnitude, and individual variability of practice effects helps ensure more accurate measurement of true cognitive change.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic