Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
Some studies suggest ACE inhibitors can worsen kidney damage and reduce renal function in renal artery stenosis, while other studies indicate they may improve renal blood flow and reduce chronic kidney disease progression.
20 papers analyzed
Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a condition characterized by the narrowing of one or both arteries that carry blood to the kidneys. This condition can lead to hypertension and kidney damage. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are commonly used to manage hypertension and heart failure, but their use in patients with RAS is complex and can have significant implications.
Research indicates that ACE inhibitors can exacerbate kidney damage in patients with RAS. This is primarily due to the reduction in renal perfusion pressure, which is critical for maintaining kidney function in the presence of arterial stenosis. Studies in animal models, such as the two-kidney, one-clip (2K-1C) rat model, have shown that ACE inhibitors like enalapril can worsen lesions in the clipped kidney, leading to increased proteinuria and decreased renal function.
ACE inhibitors can also precipitate acute renal failure (ARF) in patients with RAS. This is particularly evident in cases where renal perfusion pressure is highly dependent on angiotensin II. Clinical and experimental evidence suggests that ACE inhibitors can lead to significant reductions in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal blood flow (RBF), which can result in ARF . This risk is heightened in patients with bilateral RAS or stenosis in a single functioning kidney.
Chronic use of ACE inhibitors in patients with unilateral RAS can lead to atrophy and loss of function in the stenosed kidney. Long-term studies in animal models have demonstrated that chronic ACE inhibition can result in significant interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in the affected kidney, leading to a permanent loss of function.
Patients with RAS who are treated with ACE inhibitors require careful monitoring. Factors such as pre-existing hypotension, volume depletion, and concurrent use of diuretics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can increase the risk of ARF. It is crucial to assess renal function regularly and adjust treatment protocols accordingly.
In some cases, alternative therapies such as calcium channel blockers may be considered. However, these alternatives also have their own set of risks and benefits. For instance, calcium channel blockers like Ro 40-5967 have been shown to worsen lesions in the clipped kidney similarly to ACE inhibitors, although they may have different effects on the unclipped kidney.
For patients with significant RAS, revascularization procedures such as angioplasty or surgical repair may be necessary. These interventions can help restore renal perfusion and prevent further kidney damage. The decision to pursue revascularization should be based on a comprehensive assessment of the patient's overall health and the severity of the stenosis.
The use of ACE inhibitors in patients with renal artery stenosis presents a complex clinical challenge. While these medications are effective for managing hypertension and heart failure, they can exacerbate kidney damage and precipitate acute renal failure in patients with RAS. Careful monitoring, consideration of alternative therapies, and timely revascularization are essential strategies to mitigate these risks and preserve renal function.
Most relevant research papers on this topic