Renewable portfolio standards
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Renewable Portfolio Standards: An Overview
Introduction to Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)
Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) are state-level policies in the United States designed to increase the use of renewable energy sources and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the electric power sector. These standards mandate that electric utilities obtain a minimum percentage of their retail load from renewable sources such as wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal energy 14.
Effectiveness of RPS in Promoting Renewable Energy
Growth in Renewable Energy Markets
Over the past two decades, RPS policies have significantly contributed to the growth of renewable energy markets in the U.S., particularly in wind and solar power. Studies show that RPS adoption has led to a substantial increase in renewable electricity capacity, with a more than one-third increase in overall renewable electricity capacity 27. The stringency of RPS policies plays a crucial role, with a one-point increase in RPS stringency leading to increases of 0.2%, 1%, and 0.3% in renewable energy, solar generation, and renewable energy capacity, respectively .
Impact on Greenhouse Gas Emissions
RPS policies have been somewhat effective in reducing GHG emissions by decreasing the use of natural gas for electricity generation and increasing the use of wind and solar power. However, the effects are relatively small compared to public claims and policy goals . The effectiveness of RPS in reducing CO2 emissions also depends on future natural gas prices and the cost-effectiveness of renewable energy compared to other alternatives .
Economic and Environmental Impacts
Cost-Effectiveness and Economic Impact
The cost-effectiveness of RPS policies is a subject of debate. While RPS policies have increased the cost of electricity modestly, they have also been successful in increasing renewable generation capacity and reducing carbon emissions at a cost roughly consistent with the social cost of carbon . However, RPS policies are generally more expensive than the least-cost resource portfolios for achieving equivalent CO2 reductions .
Health and Climate Benefits
Despite the higher costs, the health and climate benefits of RPS policies often outweigh these costs. Existing RPS policies are estimated to yield $97 billion in air-pollution health benefits and $161 billion in climate damage reductions. Expanded RPS scenarios could result in even greater benefits, with health benefits totaling $558 billion and climate benefits equaling $599 billion .
Political and Economic Factors Influencing RPS Adoption
Political Support and Market Structure
RPS policies are more likely to be adopted in states with Democratic legislatures, good solar and wind potential, and restructured electricity markets. Conversely, states heavily dependent on natural gas for electricity generation are less likely to adopt RPS policies . The probability of RPS adoption also increases with the renewable energy potential of a state, with significant increases associated with higher wind and solar potential .
Regional Economic Impacts
The economic impacts of RPS policies can vary significantly at the regional level. For instance, in New Mexico, different RPS scenarios showed varying economic and environmental tradeoffs at the county level. Higher RPS targets can stimulate economic growth in targeted areas, highlighting the importance of considering regional impacts when designing RPS policies .
Conclusion
Renewable Portfolio Standards have played a crucial role in promoting renewable energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. While the cost-effectiveness of these policies is debated, the health and climate benefits often justify the higher costs. The success of RPS policies depends on their stringency, design features, and the political and economic context of the states implementing them. As the U.S. continues to pursue decarbonization goals, RPS policies will remain a key tool in the transition to a more sustainable energy future.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic