Searched over 200M research papers
6 papers analyzed
Some studies suggest vaping may be safer than traditional smoking for smoking cessation and environmental impact, while other studies indicate it can cause severe health effects, including cardiovascular disease and enhanced platelet reactivity.
20 papers analyzed
The safety and long-term impacts of vaping compared to traditional smoking have been subjects of significant research interest. While vaping is often marketed as a safer alternative to smoking, the long-term health effects remain controversial and not fully understood. This synthesis aims to present key insights from recent research on the comparative safety and long-term impacts of vaping and traditional smoking.
Cardiovascular Health Risks
Respiratory Health Risks
Oral Health Risks
Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity
Smoking Cessation Aid
The current body of research indicates that while vaping may be effective as a smoking cessation aid and might present fewer immediate adverse events compared to traditional smoking, it is not without significant health risks. Both vaping and traditional smoking have been shown to cause similar adverse effects on cardiovascular, respiratory, and oral health. The long-term impacts of vaping, particularly concerning cardiovascular and respiratory health, appear to be comparable to those of traditional smoking, with some studies suggesting potentially more severe effects. Further long-term studies are needed to fully understand the safety profile of vaping.
Most relevant research papers on this topic