Space shuttle landing procedures
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Space Shuttle Landing Procedures: Manual and Automated Approaches
Manual Landing Procedures and Pilot Challenges
The Space Shuttle was designed to allow for manual landings, which presented unique challenges due to its large, unpowered nature and low lift-to-drag ratio. Pilots had to manage complex longitudinal flying qualities, and early test flights revealed a tendency for pilot-induced oscillations near landing. To address this, operational procedures were adjusted and an adaptive stick filter was added to reduce these oscillations, making the landing task easier and safer. Simulations—both fixed-base and in-flight—were essential for evaluating and refining these procedures, ultimately enabling precise and routine landings by the crew Powers1985Powers1986.
Approach and Landing Test (ALT) Program
Before the first orbital flight, the Approach and Landing Test (ALT) program was conducted to verify the Shuttle's subsonic aerodynamic flight and landing characteristics. These tests used a modified Boeing 747 as a carrier aircraft to launch the Orbiter for in-flight testing. The ALT program also checked the airworthiness of the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft and the Orbiter, and validated both manual and automatic landing capabilities. These tests were crucial for ensuring the Shuttle could safely land after returning from space Oglesby1975Andrews1977.
Automated Landing and Autoland Systems
The Shuttle was equipped with an automated landing (Autoland) system as a backup, especially important for extended missions where crew fatigue could be a concern. Reliability analyses showed that the probability of a successful landing after long missions was similar for both manual and automated modes, as both relied on much of the same hardware. The main difference was that manual mode depended more on crew capability, while Autoland provided an essential backup if the crew was incapacitated or fatigued .
Navigation and Guidance During Landing
During the entry and landing phases, the Shuttle used an aided-inertial navigation system that combined inertial measurement unit (IMU) data with external navigation aids. This system, enhanced by a Kalman filter, helped maintain accurate position and velocity information, even during radio blackout periods. The navigation system's performance was carefully analyzed to ensure safe and precise landings, with ongoing software improvements suggested to further enhance accuracy .
Abort and Emergency Landing Procedures
In the event of an abort during ascent, the Shuttle had specific procedures for selecting and reaching an emergency landing site. The crew used pre-planned checklists and decision trees to quickly determine the best landing option based on the Shuttle's energy state and glide capability. Recent upgrades, such as the Cockpit Avionics Upgrade (CAU), provided more onboard computational power to automate these procedures, reducing crew workload and increasing the chances of a successful emergency landing Butler2003Straube2002.
Mission Control and Operational Support
Throughout the landing process, Mission Control maintained close communication with the Shuttle crew, guiding them through standard steps and procedures to ensure a safe return to Earth. Detailed schedules, tracking facilities, and contingency plans were in place for each mission, supporting both routine and emergency landings Nasa2018Nasa2019.
Conclusion
Space Shuttle landing procedures combined manual piloting skills, advanced automation, robust navigation systems, and extensive ground support. Continuous improvements in operational procedures, simulation-based training, and onboard automation contributed to the Shuttle's strong safety record and ability to perform precise landings under a variety of conditions Powers1985Oglesby1975Butler2003+5 MORE.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic
Space Shuttle Orbiter approach and landing program status
The approach and landing test phase of the Space Shuttle program evaluates the Orbiter's subsonic aerodynamic flight and landing characteristics, support equipment, ground facilities, and hardware and software for orbital missions.
DOI