Searched over 200M research papers for "stroke arm"
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that various rehabilitation techniques, including task-oriented repetitive training, monitoring with the Arm Rehabilitation Monitor, and electromechanical or robot-assisted training, can improve arm function after stroke, though their effectiveness may vary.
20 papers analyzed
Simultaneous bilateral training, which involves performing identical activities with both arms simultaneously, has been explored as a method to improve arm function and reduce impairment after a stroke. However, a comprehensive review of 18 studies involving 549 participants found no statistically significant improvements in activities of daily living (ADL) or functional movement of the upper limb when comparing bilateral training to usual care or other upper limb interventions. This suggests that while bilateral training is a popular method, its efficacy in improving arm function post-stroke remains inconclusive.
Recent literature highlights various rehabilitation techniques aimed at leveraging post-stroke brain plasticity. These techniques include activation of the ipsilesional motor cortex, inhibition of the contralesional motor cortex, and modulation of sensory afferents through methods such as distal cutaneous electrostimulation, mirror therapy, and virtual reality. Intensifying rehabilitation, particularly during the subacute phase (less than six months post-stroke), has shown significant improvements in arm function. Techniques like robot-aided therapy, neuromuscular electrostimulation, and bilateral task training are particularly effective when combined with repetitive, task-oriented training.
The use of technology to monitor arm movements in stroke rehabilitation is gaining traction. The Arm Rehabilitation Monitor (ARM), which uses an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and machine learning techniques, has shown promise in accurately detecting functional arm movements. This device can help ensure patients adhere to their rehabilitation exercises both in clinical settings and at home, potentially improving recovery outcomes.
Understanding patient preferences is crucial for effective rehabilitation. A study involving 40 stroke patients identified that both subacute and chronic patients preferred training skills related to manipulation and positioning. There was a positive correlation between the use of the impaired arm and the patients' training preferences, suggesting that client-centered assessments are essential for setting therapy goals that align with patient motivations.
Robot-assisted arm training combined with hand functional electrical stimulation (RAT + FES) has been compared to intensive conventional therapy (ICT) in subacute stroke survivors. While both groups showed significant improvements in arm motor recovery, there were no significant differences between the two groups. However, patients with moderate impairment and the presence of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) who received early rehabilitation showed the greatest improvements.
Musical sonification therapy, which involves translating arm movements into musical sounds, has been explored as a novel approach to motivate patients and provide additional sensory feedback. A study with 25 stroke patients found that those who received musical sonification therapy showed significant improvements in joint pain and movement smoothness compared to a control group. This suggests that integrating music into rehabilitation could enhance patient engagement and outcomes.
Long-term studies indicate that the degree of arm function recovery at six months post-stroke is best predicted by the motor deficit at one month. Techniques that enhance motor learning and brain reorganization, such as cortical stimulation and functional imaging, are crucial for recovery. Quantitative methods to characterize motor impairment and apply motor learning concepts are recommended for developing more effective rehabilitation techniques.
Stroke rehabilitation for arm function involves a variety of techniques, each with its own strengths and limitations. While simultaneous bilateral training and robot-assisted therapies show potential, their efficacy compared to conventional methods remains debated. Patient-centered approaches and innovative therapies like musical sonification offer promising avenues for enhancing motivation and recovery. Future research should continue to explore these diverse methods to optimize rehabilitation outcomes for stroke survivors.
Most relevant research papers on this topic