Stroke scale
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers for "stroke scale"
Consensus Meter
Understanding Stroke Scales: Key Tools for Assessment and Prognosis
Introduction to Stroke Scales
Stroke scales are essential tools used by healthcare professionals to assess the severity, impact, and prognosis of stroke in patients. These scales help in clinical decision-making, planning rehabilitation strategies, and evaluating the effectiveness of treatments. Several stroke scales have been developed, each with its unique focus and application.
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
The NIHSS is one of the most widely used stroke scales globally. It is particularly valuable for early prognostication and serial assessment of stroke severity . The NIHSS has become the gold standard for stroke severity rating, especially after its use in the NINDS r-tPA trial for acute stroke therapy. However, it is important to note that while the NIHSS is highly effective in acute settings, it may not be as useful for long-term post-stroke outcomes.
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Barthel Index (BI)
The mRS and BI are commonly used to measure functional impairment and disability following a stroke. The mRS provides a summary measure of outcome, which is particularly relevant for clinicians and patients considering early intervention. The BI, on the other hand, is useful for planning rehabilitative strategies and predicting activities of daily living disabilities in the long term . Despite their widespread use, the distinction between grades of mRS can be poorly defined, which may affect its reliability.
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
The SIS is designed to measure the patient's perspective on the effect of stroke, covering multiple domains such as physical function, memory, emotion, and communication . Rasch analysis has established the validity of the SIS, showing that it can differentiate patients into multiple strata based on their level of functioning. This makes the SIS a robust tool for capturing the comprehensive impact of stroke from the patient's viewpoint.
European Stroke Scale (ESS) and Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS)
The ESS and SSS are other notable scales used in stroke assessment. The ESS is designed for patients with middle cerebral artery stroke and has shown good interrater and intrarater reliability, as well as strong correlations with other neurological scales. The SSS, which measures functional impairment and activity limitations, is easy to administer and has high internal consistency and interrater reliability.
Challenges in Scale Selection and Interconversion
Selecting the appropriate stroke scale can be challenging due to the wide range of available instruments. A three-stage scale selection strategy, involving the review of guidance documents, theoretical considerations, and comprehensive literature search, can help in identifying the most suitable scales for specific studies. However, interconversion between different stroke scales can be problematic. For instance, while the Canadian Neurological Scale and the middle cerebral artery Neurological Score can be reliably converted, the NIHSS cannot be used to predict these scores accurately.
Conclusion
Stroke scales are indispensable tools in the assessment and management of stroke. Each scale has its strengths and limitations, and the choice of scale should be guided by the specific needs of the clinical or research setting. Familiarity with these scales can significantly improve clinicians' interpretation of stroke research and their clinical decision-making, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic