Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that tooth surfaces vary in susceptibility to caries based on age, tooth type, and location, with primary teeth, molar occlusal surfaces, and younger individuals showing higher prevalence, and that factors like age, sex, and habits influence caries outcomes.
20 papers analyzed
Research comparing radiographic and clinical assessments of caries in posterior approximal surfaces of primary and permanent teeth reveals significant differences in caries detection. In permanent teeth, 0% of radiolucencies in the outer half of enamel, 10.5% in the inner half of enamel, 40.9% extending to the outer half of dentine, and 100% extending to the inner half of dentine were found to be cavitated clinically. For primary teeth, the corresponding figures were 2.0%, 2.9%, 28.3%, and 95.5% respectively. This suggests that radiographic assessments may underestimate the extent of cavitation, particularly in the early stages of enamel caries.
A study assessing caries prevalence on individual tooth surfaces found that approximal surfaces of incisors, canines, and premolars, as well as occlusal fissures in molars, exhibited the highest caries rates. Caries were more prevalent in the maxillary jaw (62.4%) compared to the mandibular jaw (37.6%). This highlights the need for targeted preventive measures for these high-risk surfaces.
The structural integrity of tooth surfaces changes with age. Unerupted and recently erupted teeth have similar surface characteristics, which differ significantly from older teeth exposed to attritional and environmental influences. These changes include the appearance of enamel rod ends, perikymata, scratches, and cracks. Understanding these age-related changes is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.
Hierarchical clustering of tooth surface-level caries data identified five distinct groups of surfaces with varying caries susceptibility: pit and fissure molar surfaces, mandibular anterior surfaces, posterior non-pit and fissure surfaces, maxillary anterior surfaces, and mid-dentition surfaces. These clusters help in understanding the differential impact of risk factors on caries development.
In a study of Scottish adolescents, molar occlusal surfaces were found to be the most susceptible to caries, with 35.8% of those at risk becoming carious over three years. Buccal and lingual smooth surfaces showed low susceptibility, but 8.8% of buccal and palatal pits developed caries. Pit and fissure caries accounted for 48% of caries prevalence, interproximal surfaces for 39%, and smooth surfaces for 13%. This data underscores the importance of focusing preventive efforts on molar occlusal surfaces and interproximal areas.
Decalcification studies of human incisor teeth reveal that the topographies of dentin and enamel surfaces reflect their developmental processes and functional roles. These differences are crucial for understanding the mechanical properties and wear patterns of teeth.
The adhesive properties of enamel and dentine are primarily influenced by their organic components. Under physiological conditions, teeth are covered with salivary films that reduce the potential for strong adhesive contacts. Effective clinical adhesion requires isolation from saliva during procedures to enhance the bonding of restorative materials.
The susceptibility of tooth surfaces to caries varies significantly based on their location and structural characteristics. Posterior approximal surfaces, occlusal fissures, and interproximal areas are particularly prone to caries, necessitating targeted preventive strategies. Age-related changes and the inherent adhesive properties of tooth surfaces further complicate caries management. Understanding these factors is essential for developing effective diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in dental practice.
Most relevant research papers on this topic