Searched over 200M research papers for "dental rinse"
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that preprocedural mouth rinses, especially those containing chlorhexidine or hydrogen peroxide, can reduce bacterial and viral contamination in dental aerosols, while other mouth rinses show varying effectiveness in reducing plaque, gingivitis, and other dental conditions.
20 papers analyzed
Dental rinses, commonly known as mouthwashes, are widely used in dental care for various purposes, including reducing bacterial load, preventing plaque formation, and mitigating the risk of infections. This article synthesizes recent research on the effectiveness and safety of different types of dental rinses, focusing on their role in reducing aerosol contamination, preventing dental plaque and gingivitis, and their impact on dental enamel.
Preprocedural mouth rinses are hypothesized to reduce the microbial load in aerosols generated during dental procedures, potentially lowering the risk of infection transmission to dental healthcare providers. Studies have shown that chlorhexidine (CHX) and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouth rinses can significantly reduce bacterial contamination in aerosols compared to no rinsing or rinsing with water . However, the evidence is of low to very low certainty, and further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine the clinical significance of the reductions observed.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of preprocedural mouth rinses was recommended to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2. A study found that hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, and CPC mouth rinses significantly reduced salivary viral load compared to no rinsing, suggesting their potential as a risk mitigation step in dental settings.
Several studies have compared the effectiveness of various mouth rinses in controlling dental plaque and gingivitis. Chlorhexidine (CHX) and fluoride mouth rinses have been found to be more effective than essential oils (EO) in reducing plaque and gingivitis, particularly in caries-free individuals. Additionally, CPC mouth rinses have shown similar efficacy to EO rinses in preventing gingivitis and plaque accumulation over a six-month period.
CPC mouth rinses have been shown to slow the progression of gingival inflammation by inhibiting the maturation of dental plaque and maintaining the original biodiversity of healthy plaques. This is achieved by preventing the acquisition of new bacterial taxa that contribute to gingivitis.
The safety of mouth rinses on dental enamel is a critical consideration. Studies have shown that mouth rinses can lead to changes in enamel surface properties, including increased roughness and color changes. All tested mouth rinses resulted in a higher level of microhardness loss compared to control groups, indicating potential adverse effects on enamel .
While some mouth rinses, such as those containing pyrophosphate, have been tested for their anti-calculus efficacy, results have been inconclusive, and no significant adverse effects on mucosa or teeth were observed. However, the acceptability and feasibility of these interventions for patients and dentists were not thoroughly assessed in the studies reviewed.
Dental rinses play a significant role in reducing bacterial load, controlling plaque and gingivitis, and potentially mitigating the transmission of infectious diseases in dental settings. Chlorhexidine and cetylpyridinium chloride rinses are particularly effective in these roles. However, the safety of these products on dental enamel and their long-term effects require further investigation. Future research should focus on standardized outcome measurements and the acceptability of these interventions to provide more definitive conclusions.
Most relevant research papers on this topic