Destructive leaders increase performance
Searched over 200M research papers
Research Analysis by Consensus
Consensus Meter
The Impact of Destructive Leadership on Performance
Introduction to Destructive Leadership
Destructive leadership is a critical area of study within organizational behavior, focusing on leaders who engage in harmful behaviors that negatively impact their followers and the organization. This type of leadership can manifest in various forms, including abusive supervision, petty tyranny, and pseudo-transformational leadership, each with distinct characteristics and consequences.
Negative Effects on Work Engagement and Burnout
Research consistently shows that destructive leadership has detrimental effects on employees' work engagement and burnout levels. A meta-analysis integrating Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) theory found that destructive leadership is negatively related to followers' work engagement and positively related to burnout. This indicates that employees under destructive leaders are less motivated and more likely to experience exhaustion and stress.
Impact on Job Performance
Destructive leadership also has a significant negative impact on job performance. Multiple studies have demonstrated that destructive leadership correlates with lower individual performance, higher turnover intentions, and increased counterproductive work behaviors . These negative outcomes are often mediated by factors such as leader-member exchange, perceived organizational support, and job satisfaction, which are all adversely affected by destructive leadership.
Curvilinear Relationships and Extreme Levels
Interestingly, some research suggests that the relationship between destructive leadership and workplace behaviors may be curvilinear, particularly at extreme levels of destructive behavior. This means that while moderate levels of destructive leadership are harmful, extremely high levels can have even more pronounced negative effects on job performance and organizational citizenship behaviors.
Mechanisms and Mediators
The mechanisms through which destructive leadership impacts performance are complex. Studies highlight that destructive leaders often prey on followers based on their performance and personality traits, with a particular focus on those exhibiting counterproductive work behaviors. Additionally, the negative impact on mental health, including increased stress and burnout, further mediates the relationship between destructive leadership and job performance.
Different Types of Destructive Leadership
Destructive leadership is not a monolithic construct; it includes various types such as follower-directed, organization-directed, and self-interested behaviors. Each type has different effects on followers' emotional reactions and turnover intentions. For instance, follower-directed destructive behaviors, such as abuse, have the strongest negative impact on followers' emotions and are most likely to increase turnover intentions.
Conclusion
In summary, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that destructive leadership decreases performance by reducing work engagement, increasing burnout, and fostering negative workplace behaviors. The detrimental effects are mediated by factors like leader-member exchange and job satisfaction, and are exacerbated at extreme levels of destructive behavior. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing interventions to mitigate the harmful impacts of destructive leadership in organizations.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic