Ferrous sulfate vs iron
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Comparative Analysis of Ferrous Sulfate and Other Iron Supplements
Introduction to Iron Supplements
Iron supplements are essential for treating iron-deficiency anemia, a condition characterized by low levels of iron in the body, leading to reduced hemoglobin production. Among the various forms of iron supplements, ferrous sulfate is widely used, but it is often associated with gastrointestinal side effects. This article compares the efficacy and side effects of ferrous sulfate with other iron supplements, including lactoferrin, ferric citrate, ferrous fumarate, and ferrous bisglycinate.
Efficacy of Ferrous Sulfate vs. Lactoferrin
Lactoferrin, a milk-derived iron-binding glycoprotein, has shown superior results in improving serum iron parameters and hemoglobin levels compared to ferrous sulfate. A comprehensive review and meta-analysis revealed that lactoferrin supplementation significantly increased serum iron, ferritin, and hemoglobin concentrations while reducing fractional iron absorption and IL-6 levels, indicating an anti-inflammatory effect . This suggests that lactoferrin may be a more effective and better-tolerated alternative to ferrous sulfate for improving iron status.
Ferrous Sulfate vs. Ferric Citrate in CKD Patients
In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), ferric citrate has been found to be more effective than ferrous sulfate in increasing transferrin saturation (TSAT) and ferritin levels. A randomized trial involving CKD patients demonstrated that ferric citrate led to a greater increase in TSAT and ferritin compared to ferrous sulfate over 12 weeks, without significant differences in hemoglobin levels or adverse events . This indicates that ferric citrate may be a preferable option for CKD patients with iron deficiency.
Bioavailability of Ferrous Fumarate vs. Ferrous Sulfate
Ferrous fumarate is another iron supplement recommended for food fortification. Studies have shown that ferrous fumarate has similar iron absorption rates to ferrous sulfate in non-anemic women and children. Research conducted in Mexican women and children found no significant differences in iron absorption between ferrous fumarate and ferrous sulfate, suggesting that ferrous fumarate is equally effective for preventing iron deficiency .
Gastrointestinal Side Effects of Ferrous Sulfate
Ferrous sulfate is associated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal side effects compared to other iron supplements. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials confirmed that ferrous sulfate significantly increases the risk of gastrointestinal side effects compared to placebo and intravenous iron . This highlights the need for alternative iron supplements with better gastrointestinal tolerability.
Ferrous Bisglycinate vs. Ferrous Sulfate in Pregnancy
Ferrous bisglycinate has been shown to be as effective as ferrous sulfate in preventing iron deficiency and anemia during pregnancy, with fewer gastrointestinal complaints. A randomized trial involving pregnant women found that ferrous bisglycinate at a lower dose was not inferior to ferrous sulfate in preventing iron deficiency anemia and was associated with fewer gastrointestinal side effects . This makes ferrous bisglycinate a suitable alternative for pregnant women.
Conclusion
While ferrous sulfate is a commonly used iron supplement, it is often associated with gastrointestinal side effects. Alternatives such as lactoferrin, ferric citrate, ferrous fumarate, and ferrous bisglycinate have shown comparable or superior efficacy with better tolerability. These findings suggest that healthcare providers should consider these alternatives, especially for patients who experience adverse effects with ferrous sulfate.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic