Searched over 200M research papers for "stroke screening"
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that various tools and methods, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), LAPSS, ROSIER scale, Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS), and MRI screening, are effective for different aspects of stroke screening, while prehospital stroke scales and current blood biomarkers show mixed results, and there is a lack of standardized tools for post-stroke visual impairments.
20 papers analyzed
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) are the most reliable tools for screening cognitive impairment in stroke survivors. The MoCA is particularly effective for identifying a wide range of cognitive impairments, while the MMSE is best suited for detecting dementia. Other tools like the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) and the Barrow Neurological Institute Screen for Higher Cerebral Functions (BNIS) are also useful for detecting multiple-domain impairments.
The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS) is a stroke-specific tool designed to be completed in 15-20 minutes. It is aphasia- and neglect-friendly, covering domains such as memory, language, executive function, and number abilities. This tool is validated for use with stroke patients and provides domain-specific scores to guide rehabilitation.
Systematic screening for cognitive and sensory impairments in acute stroke patients can significantly improve detection rates compared to standard clinical practice. Formal screening methods have been shown to identify more impairments, which are often undocumented in patient charts, thereby enhancing discharge planning and rehabilitation outcomes.
The Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) is highly sensitive and is recommended for use in the field by paramedics. It has consistently shown the highest sensitivity among various prehospital stroke scales, making it a preferred choice for early stroke identification.
The Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS) is another effective tool for identifying stroke patients in the field. It has demonstrated high sensitivity (91%) and specificity (97%) in prospective validation studies, making it a reliable option for prehospital stroke screening.
The ROSIER scale is highly effective in emergency room settings, with a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.76. It is particularly useful when administered by emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency department (ED) paramedic staff.
There is no standardized tool that accurately assesses all potential post-stroke visual impairments. Existing tools often miss various visual defects, especially in patients with aphasia or communicative deficits. Future research is needed to develop comprehensive screening tools that can be easily administered by healthcare professionals.
The development of reliable blood biomarkers for stroke diagnosis is crucial, especially for young adults and children. Current methods lack sensitivity and specificity, leading to delays in triage and diagnosis. Research is ongoing to identify effective single biomarkers and biomarker panels that can improve early stroke diagnosis.
Using MRI as a routine screening modality before thrombolysis in acute stroke patients has proven feasible and effective. Quality improvement processes have significantly reduced door-to-needle (DTN) times, making it possible to deliver IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) within national benchmark times.
Effective stroke screening involves a combination of cognitive, prehospital, visual, and biomarker assessments. Tools like the MoCA, CPSS, LAPSS, and ROSIER scale have shown high reliability in various settings. However, there is a need for more comprehensive and standardized tools, especially for visual impairments and blood biomarkers, to improve early diagnosis and treatment outcomes.
Most relevant research papers on this topic