QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SINGLE‐ VS. MULTIPLE‐SET PROGRAMS IN RESISTANCE TRAINING

doi:10.1519/1533-4287(2004)018<0035:QAOSVM>2.0.CO;2

Paper

QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SINGLE‐ VS. MULTIPLE‐SET PROGRAMS IN RESISTANCE TRAINING

Published Feb 1, 2004 · B. L. Wolfe, L. Lemura, P. J. Cole

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Q1 SJR score

119

Citations

11

Influential Citations

Full textSemantic Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the existing research on single-set vs. multiple-set resistance training programs. Using the meta-analytic approach, we included studies that met the following criteria in our analysis: (a) at least 6 subjects per group; (b) subject groups consisting of single-set vs. multiple-set resistance training programs; (c) pretest and posttest strength measures; (d) training programs of 6 weeks or more; (e) apparently “healthy” individuals free from orthopedic limitations; and (f) published studies in English-language journals only. Sixteen studies generated 103 effect sizes (ESs) based on a total of 621 subjects, ranging in age from 15–71 years. Across all designs, intervention strategies, and categories, the pretest to posttest ES in muscular strength was (x = 1.4 ± 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.41–3.8; p < 0.001). The results of 2 X 2 analysis of variance revealed simple main effects for age, training status (trained vs. untrained), and research design (p < 0.001). No significant main effects were found for sex, program duration, and set end point. Significant interactions were found for training status and program duration (6–16 weeks vs. 17–40 weeks) and number of sets performed (single vs. multiple). The data indicated that trained individuals performing multiple sets generated significantly greater increases in strength (p < 0.001). For programs with an extended duration, multiple sets were superior to single sets (p < 0.05). This quantitative review indicates that single-set programs for an initial short training period in untrained individuals result in similar strength gains as multiple-set programs. However, as progression occurs and higher gains are desired, multiple-set programs are more effective.

Meta-Analysis

Highly Cited

Study Snapshot

Multiple-set resistance training programs are more effective for long-duration strength gains than single-set programs for untrained individuals.

PopulationOlder adults (50-71 years)

Sample size24

MethodsObservational

OutcomesBody Mass Index projections

ResultsSocial networks mitigate obesity in older groups.

Sign up to use Study Snapshot

Consensus is limited without an account. Create an account or sign in to get more searches and use the Study Snapshot.

Create an account

Paper

QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SINGLE‐ VS. MULTIPLE‐SET PROGRAMS IN RESISTANCE TRAINING

Sign up to use Study Snapshot

References

Berger in retrospect: effect of varied weight training programmes on strength

Multiple sets of exercise may not be superior to a single set for maximal strength gains, as suggested by Berger in 1962.

Factors that alter body fat, body mass, and fat-free mass in pediatric obesity.

Exercise programs, particularly low-intensity, long-duration aerobic exercise combined with high-repetition resistance training, effectively reduce body composition variables in children and adolescents.

American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.

Progression in resistance training for healthy adults should include concentric and eccentric muscle actions, single- and multiple-joint exercises, and follow a specific sequence to optimize exercise intensity.

Single‐vs. Multiple‐Set Strength Training in Women

Multiple-set strength training leads to superior strength gains compared to single-set strength training in women with basic resistance training experience.

Effects of resistance training on insulin-like growth factor-I and IGF binding proteins.

Resistance training increases circulating IGF-I, which may partially mediate strength gains, with higher strength gains in the first 13 weeks of training.

Low-volume circuit versus high-volume periodized resistance training in women.

Both low-volume single-set and high-volume, periodized multiple-set resistance training programs improve muscular performance in untrained women, but training adaptations differ based on movement speed, exercise choices, and exercise variation.

Influence of Resistance Training Volume and Periodization on Physiological and Performance Adaptations in Collegiate Women Tennis Players

Periodized multiple-set resistance training is superior to low-volume single-set training methods in developing physical abilities in competitive, collegiate women tennis players.

Short‐Term Performance Effects of Weight Training With Multiple Sets Not to Failure vs. a Single Set to Failure in Women

Multiple sets not to failure in weight training leads to superior adaptations in short-term performance improvements for young women compared to single-set training to failure.

Time course for strength and muscle thickness changes following upper and lower body resistance training in men and women

High-intensity upper and lower body resistance training leads to similar strength and muscle thickness gains, with greater and earlier increases in upper body muscle thickness compared to lower extremity gains.

Citations

Effects of physical training programs on female tennis players’ performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Physical training programs significantly improve muscle power, strength, agility, serve velocity, and serve accuracy in female tennis players, but not linear sprint speed.

Resistance training prescription for muscle strength and hypertrophy in healthy adults: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

All resistance training prescriptions improve muscle strength and hypertrophy compared to no exercise, with higher-load, multiset, thrice-weekly training being the most effective for strength gains.

The influence of resistance exercise training prescription variables on skeletal muscle mass, strength, and physical function in healthy adults: An umbrella review

Resistance training increases muscle mass, strength, and physical function in healthy adults, with intensity and weekly frequency affecting strength, while volume influences both strength and hypertrophy.

Balance, physical conditioning, and health perception in elderly women submitted to a 32-week physical exercise program

A 32-week physical exercise program significantly improved balance, muscle strength, agility, and health perception in elderly women compared to a control group.

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction During Rest From High-intensity Training on Muscle Hypertrophy and Muscle Strength

Blood flow restriction during rest from high-intensity training can lead to muscle hypertrophy and strength with fewer exercise repetitions than training only, without exacerbated pain during exercise.

Maximizing Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review of Advanced Resistance Training Techniques and Methods

Advanced resistance training techniques, such as supersets and blood flow restriction, may provide time-efficient solutions for muscle hypertrophy and breaking through training plateaus.

Re-examination of 1- vs. 3-Sets of Resistance Exercise for Pre-spaceflight Muscle Conditioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Three-set resistance exercise is preferable for astronauts preparing for spaceflight, but single-set training can still provide a positive strength training stimulus.

Resistance Training and Skeletal Muscle Protein Metabolism in Eumenorrheic Females: Implications for Researchers and Practitioners

Menstrual cycle phase may impact strength in females, while oral contraception use may reduce skeletal muscle protein synthesis, but not strength outcomes.