Paper
The benefits of interventions for work-related stress.
Published 2001 · J. J. Klink, R. Blonk, A. Schene
American journal of public health
950
Citations
48
Influential Citations
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This quantitative meta-analysis sought to determine the effectiveness of occupational stress-reducing interventions and the populations for which such interventions are most beneficial. METHODS Forty-eight experimental studies (n = 3736) were included in the analysis. Four intervention types were distinguished: cognitive-behavioral interventions, relaxation techniques, multimodal programs, and organization-focused interventions. RESULTS A small but significant overall effect was found. A moderate effect was found for cognitive-behavioral interventions and multimodal interventions, and a small effect was found for relaxation techniques. The effect size for organization-focused interventions was nonsignificant. Effects were most pronounced on the following outcome categories: complaints, psychologic resources and responses, and perceived quality of work life. CONCLUSIONS Stress management interventions are effective. Cognitive-behavioral interventions are more effective than the other intervention types.
Stress management interventions are effective, with cognitive-behavioral interventions being more effective than relaxation techniques and organization-focused interventions.
Sign up to use Study Snapshot
Consensus is limited without an account. Create an account or sign in to get more searches and use the Study Snapshot.
Full text analysis coming soon...