Paper
Halitosis in dogs and the effect of periodontal therapy.
Published Dec 1, 1998 · J. Rawlings, N. Culham
The Journal of nutrition
11
Citations
0
Influential Citations
Abstract
Bad breath (halitosis or oral malodor) is a common problem in companion animals as well as humans (Culham and Rawlings 1998). Extensive studies of human halitosis have established that microbial metabolism of proteinaceous substrates in the oral cavity leads to the production of volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) such as hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan. Volatile sulfur compounds and the bacteria responsible for their production have also been implicated in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease in humans. In companion animals, bad breath constitutes a significant psychosociological problem in the companion animal–owner relationship. However, the association between bad breath and periodontal disease in companion animals poses an important issue because this may also be the first clinical sign of periodontal disease noticed by the owner. Limited research has been conducted into bad breath in companion animals; most of the information available on halitosis has been derived from human studies. We have initiated a series of studies to examine the cause and effect of oral malodor in dogs. The aim of these studies is to establish an appropriate methodology for assessing bad breath and the relationship between bad breath and oral hygiene. Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition where the dogs were housed in purpose-built, environmentally enriched facilities (Loveridge 1994) and treated in accordance with the Centre’s noninvasive research ethics. Eleven dogs of different breeds and ages (mean 8.2 y; range 1.5–16 y), reported to have varying degrees of malodor as assessed by the people who worked with them, were used in this study. One dog was used as a reference dog against which all other dogs were compared. The dogs were fed a number of different commercial diets throughout the study. Measurement of VSC was performed using a portable sulfide monitor (Halimeter, Interscan). Measurements were made three times a day on five separate occasions over a 6-wk period. Readings were obtained before feeding, and 1 and 5 h after feeding. To compare the VSC levels with the perception of oral malodor, a panel of five judges, previously trained in assessing aromas/flavors, subjectively assessed the dogs and recorded their findings on a visual analog scale with 0 representing no odor and 100 severe odor. The organoleptic assessment was performed 1 h after the morning feeding and was repeated on two separate days, 1 wk apart. To determine the effect of periodontal therapy on halitosis, five dogs with some of the highest VSC scores and in need of routine veterinary dental treatment were identified. Therapy included supragingival scaling and polishing to remove all dental deposits, and the extraction of teeth where this was felt appropriate for the health of the dog. After treatment, VSC measurements and organoleptic assessment of the dogs’ breath were repeated on a weekly or biweekly basis for the subsequent 12 wk.
Non-RCT
Animal StudyPeriodontal therapy effectively reduces oral odor in dogs, potentially improving their overall health and reducing the risk of periodontal disease.
Sign up to use Study Snapshot
Consensus is limited without an account. Create an account or sign in to get more searches and use the Study Snapshot.
Full text analysis coming soon...