Paper
Nitric oxide donor, linsidomine chlorhydrate (SIN-1), in the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction: Critical appraisal and review of the literature
Published 2007 · H. Wegner, H. Knispel, T. Meier
International Urology and Nephrology
2
Citations
0
Influential Citations
Abstract
Recent experimental work has demonstrated that nitric oxide (NO) is the neutrotransmitter responsible for cavernous smooth muscle relaxation. Different studies on the performance of the direct NO-donor linsidomine chlorhydrate (SIN-1) in patients with erectile dysfunction have come to conflicting results ranging from highest praise to complete dismissal. We reviewed all published studies on the use of SIN-1 for intracorporeal injection in erectile failure including our own. To this date, 3 groups published their data. Only the uncontrolled data from Hannover claim good results. The controlled data from Hamburg and Berlin on patients with erectile failure due to venous leakage, to a mixed aetiology in a double-blind fashion and to mixed aetiology with drug increase (1 mg versus 2 mg of SIN-1) showed a significantly worse performance of SIN-1 compared to the standard drug for penile injection, prostaglandin E1. We conclude that there is no place for linsidomine chlorhydrate in either the diagnosis or the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Linsidomine chlorhydrate (SIN-1) has no place in the diagnosis or treatment of erectile dysfunction due to its poor performance compared to prostaglandin E1.
Sign up to use Study Snapshot
Consensus is limited without an account. Create an account or sign in to get more searches and use the Study Snapshot.
Full text analysis coming soon...