Do home crowds impact referee bias?
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
Impact of Home Crowds on Referee Bias in Sports
Introduction to Home Crowd Influence on Referee Bias
The influence of home crowds on referee bias has been a subject of extensive research in various sports. The presence of spectators is often believed to sway referees' decisions, potentially giving home teams an advantage. This article synthesizes findings from multiple studies to understand how home crowds impact referee bias, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic when many games were played without spectators.
Evidence from NBA Games During the COVID-19 Pandemic
A study examining NBA games during the COVID-19 pandemic found that the absence of crowds did not lead to significant differences in how referees treated home and away teams in crucial situations. This research utilized data from NBA Last Two Minute Reports and compared games played in empty arenas during the 2020-2021 season with those played before the pandemic. Contrary to many prior studies, the findings suggested that crowd support does not cause referees to treat teams differently in critical moments.
Systematic Review of Football Matches During the Pandemic
A systematic review of football matches during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that the absence of crowds generally reduced the home advantage. This review analyzed 28 articles and found that without spectators, teams' technical, tactical, and physical performances were often worse. Additionally, referees appeared to be fairer without the influence of crowd support, indicating that spectators play a significant role in home advantage and referee bias.
Home Advantage and Referee Bias in European Football
Research on European football, specifically the UEFA Champions League and Europa League, showed that referees issued more yellow cards to away teams than home teams, with the extent of this bias increasing with crowd density. This study highlighted that crowd size and proximity were not significant factors once crowd density was controlled, suggesting that the presence of a large, supportive crowd can influence referees' decisions.
The Sound of Silence: Matches Without Spectators
Another study focused on matches played without spectators during the COVID-19 pandemic in top European football leagues. The findings indicated a reduction in home advantage and the absence of referee bias in these matches. This supports the idea that crowd noise significantly contributes to both phenomena, as the lack of spectators led to more balanced officiating.
Insights from UEFA Nations League Matches
An analysis of UEFA Nations League matches compared games played with and without spectators. The study found that both home advantage and referee bias were present in matches with spectators but significantly reduced in those without. This further underscores the decisive role of crowd support in influencing match outcomes and referee decisions.
Referee Bias in Spanish and Brazilian Soccer
Studies on Spanish and Brazilian soccer leagues also provided insights into referee bias. In Spanish soccer, referees were found to be more inclined to book away team players when there was a large crowd, suggesting that social pressure from spectators affects their decisions. Similarly, in the Brazilian league, the absence of spectators during the pandemic did not reduce home advantage but did affect referee bias, with fewer yellow cards awarded to away teams.
Conclusion
The collective findings from these studies indicate that home crowds do impact referee bias in various sports. The presence of spectators tends to increase the likelihood of referees favoring home teams, particularly in terms of disciplinary actions like yellow cards. However, the absence of crowds during the COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to observe more balanced officiating, highlighting the significant role that crowd support plays in influencing referee decisions.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic