How do we study and classify living organisms?
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
Studying and Classifying Living Organisms
Traditional Taxonomic Classification
Linnaean System and Catalogue of Life (CoL)
The traditional method of classifying living organisms is based on the Linnaean system, which organizes species into a hierarchical structure of ranks such as kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species. The Catalogue of Life (CoL) is a comprehensive database that incorporates the opinions of over 3,000 taxonomists to classify more than 1.6 million species. This system is not phylogenetic or evolutionary but rather a consensus view that balances expert opinions, public usage, and conflicting evidence about taxon boundaries.
Broad Classification Systems
Historically, organisms were classified into two kingdoms: Plantae and Animalia. However, significant changes have led to the recognition of additional kingdoms. For example, the classification of algae has been revised, and the concept of a third kingdom, Protista, has been introduced to include unicellular organisms. Additionally, fungi are now considered a separate kingdom due to their distinct evolutionary path from plants.
Molecular and Genetic Approaches
Molecular Phylogenetics
Molecular phylogenetics uses DNA and protein sequences to classify organisms. This method has challenged the traditional five-kingdom system, supporting instead the division of life into three domains: Archaebacteria, Eubacteria, and Eukaryota. Studies on genes like glutamine synthetase and rRNA have shown that archaebacteria are more closely related to eubacteria than to eukaryota, supporting a division into two superkingdoms: Prokaryota and Eukaryota.
Genomic Reclassification
Recent advancements in genome sequencing have led to the development of new classification systems based on genetic content rather than phenotypic traits. For instance, a rhizomal classification system uses a genetic network to represent evolutionary relationships more accurately. This system has identified a new taxon, the fifth TRUC, which includes candidate phyla radiation (CPR) organisms, separate from Bacteria, Archaea, Eukarya, and giant viruses.
Automated and Computational Methods
Machine Learning and Neural Networks
Machine learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have been employed to classify organisms based on DNA sequences. These methods have shown high accuracy and sensitivity, outperforming traditional algorithms. They are particularly useful for genome analysis and can handle large datasets efficiently.
Rule-Based and Hierarchical Systems
Expert systems using rule-based methods can classify organisms without the complexities of traditional dichotomous keys. These systems use a set of predefined rules to infer classifications and can integrate with other automated taxonomy systems. Hierarchical supervised learning frameworks also offer scalable solutions for classifying organisms into taxonomies, providing robustness against mutations and noise in DNA sequences .
Integrative Approaches
Combining Phylogenetics and Comparative Genomics
Integrative methods that combine phylogenetic data with comparative genomics are useful for reconstructing evolutionary histories. For example, integrating Markov clustering with molecular phylogenetics has been applied to cyanobacteria, providing insights into their metabolic and phenotypic diversity. These methods are computationally efficient and can be extended to other phyla.
Genome Similarity-Based Classification
A novel approach proposes using genome similarity to classify and name organisms. This system assigns codes based on genetic similarity, allowing for automatic classification without requiring phenotypic or phylogenetic analysis. This method aligns well with current taxonomic groups and can adapt to new discoveries, making it a valuable tool for biodiversity research and other fields.
Conclusion
The study and classification of living organisms have evolved significantly from traditional taxonomic methods to modern molecular and computational approaches. Integrating various methods, from the Linnaean system to genome-based classifications, provides a comprehensive understanding of the diversity and evolutionary relationships among species. As technology advances, these methods will continue to improve, offering more accurate and scalable solutions for classifying the vast array of life on Earth.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic