Consensus vs Google Scholar

Research shouldn’t feel like combing through pages of links — it should answer your question directly. Consensus saves users hours a day in reading through papers.

Consensus vs Google Scholar

Research shouldn’t feel like combing through pages of links — it should answer your question directly. Consensus saves users hours a day in reading through papers.

Consensus vs Google Scholar

Research shouldn’t feel like combing through pages of links — it should answer your question directly. Consensus saves users hours a day in reading through papers.

It was about time for academic search to evolve

Drag to compare Consensus vs Google Scholar side-by-side

Google Scholar

Traditional keyword searches

Traditional keyword searches

List of paper results

List of paper results

No AI synthesis

No AI synthesis

Consensus

Conversational question answering

Conversational question answering

Answers with paper citations

Answers with paper citations

Automatic summarization of papers

Automatic summarization of papers

Consensus Outperforms Google Scholar for Academic Search

An independent evaluation shows that Consensus consistently beats Google Scholar with an overall relevance advantage of approximately 7–10%.

Average Precision

Measures the % of results that are truly relevant • Consensus: 88.1% • Google Scholar: 81.8% Consensus is 7.4% better at returning relevant papers.

Average Precision

Measures the % of results that are truly relevant • Consensus: 88.1% • Google Scholar: 81.8% Consensus is 7.4% better at returning relevant papers.

Average Precision

Measures the % of results that are truly relevant • Consensus: 88.1% • Google Scholar: 81.8% Consensus is 7.4% better at returning relevant papers.

Discounted Cumulative Gain (DCG)

Weights higher-ranked results more heavily to measure ranking quality. • Consensus: 45.16 • Google Scholar: 40.73 Consensus is 10.3% better at placing relevant papers at the top.

Discounted Cumulative Gain (DCG)

Weights higher-ranked results more heavily to measure ranking quality. • Consensus: 45.16 • Google Scholar: 40.73 Consensus is 10.3% better at placing relevant papers at the top.

Discounted Cumulative Gain (DCG)

Weights higher-ranked results more heavily to measure ranking quality. • Consensus: 45.16 • Google Scholar: 40.73 Consensus is 10.3% better at placing relevant papers at the top.

Average Relevance by Rank

Tracks relevance across each result position. Consensus delivers higher relevance at every rank, not just the top results, ensuring better overall search quality.

Average Relevance by Rank

Tracks relevance across each result position. Consensus delivers higher relevance at every rank, not just the top results, ensuring better overall search quality.

Join the 8 million researchers finding research faster

Watch the video below to see how Consensus works, understand where the sources come from, and learn how to use core features like filters and study snapshots.