H. R. Hudson, F. Ismail, M. Pianka
Aug 1, 2001
Citations
0
Influential Citations
23
Citations
Journal
Phosphorus, Sulfur, and Silicon and the Related Elements
Abstract
Abstract α-Aminopropane-phosphonous,-methylphosphinic, and-phenylphosphinic acids do not exhibit comparable antifungal activity to that shown by α-aminopropanephosphonic acid (ampropylfos) against Drechslera teres, when applied as seed dressings. It is concluded that the phosphonic acid function is necessary for this type of activity. Moderate activity against several organisms was nevertheless shown by α-aminopropane-and α-aminoethane-phosphonous acids in foliar spray tests, although longer chain compounds were found to be inactive, α-Ureidopropanephosphonate (ammonium salt) also showed activity in foliar tests at 1000 ppm. A range of new ureylene-and thioureylene-bisphosphonates, prepared as potential profungicides of ampropylfos, proved to be inactive as seed dressings although tetrakis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) thioureylenebis(1-propylphosphonate) gave 75–100% control of Puccinia recondita as a foliar spray (1000 ppm). Characterization of the various compounds by nmr spectroscopy and mass spectrometry is discussed.