Do high stakes standardized tests improve education outcomes?
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
The Impact of High-Stakes Standardized Tests on Education Outcomes
Introduction to High-Stakes Standardized Testing
High-stakes standardized testing has become a central tool for educational reform in many countries, particularly in the United States and the United Kingdom. These tests are designed to hold schools, teachers, and students accountable by attaching significant consequences to test performance, such as school funding, teacher evaluations, and student promotions.
High-Stakes Testing and Student Achievement
Lack of Evidence for Improved Achievement
Research indicates that high-stakes standardized testing does not necessarily lead to higher student achievement. One study found no relationship between the pressure of high-stakes testing and improved student performance in math at the fourth- and eighth-grade levels on the National Assessment of Educational Progress tests. Another study highlights that the focus on high-stakes testing detracts from the quality of teaching, which is a more critical factor in student achievement.
Incentives and Student Behavior
While some studies suggest that high-stakes testing can influence student behavior positively, the overall impact on educational outcomes remains questionable. For instance, a study showed that students who were downgraded due to a reform-induced recoding of their grades performed better on subsequent assessments and had a higher likelihood of university enrollment. This suggests that incentives associated with high-stakes exams can motivate students to invest more in their education.
Social Reproduction and Inequality
Reproduction of Social Inequality
High-stakes testing has been criticized for perpetuating social inequalities. Research applying Bernstein’s concept of the pedagogic device found that these tests contribute to the reproduction of dominant social relations in education by structuring knowledge and regulating student identities. This means that high-stakes tests often reinforce existing social hierarchies rather than leveling the playing field.
Impact on Low-Income and Minority Students
High-stakes testing is particularly harmful to low-income and minority students. The emphasis on standardized testing and tougher standards has been shown to be uniquely detrimental to these groups, often exacerbating educational inequities rather than addressing them. This is because schools serving disadvantaged communities may lack the resources to improve test scores without sacrificing meaningful instruction.
Effects on Teaching and Curriculum
Narrowing of Curriculum
High-stakes testing can lead to a narrowing of the curriculum, where subjects not included in the tests receive less attention. However, some studies have found that schools facing immediate sanctions under high-stakes testing policies made substantial gains not only in high-stakes subjects like math and reading but also in low-stakes subjects such as science. This suggests that the impact on curriculum breadth may vary depending on the specific context and implementation of the testing policies.
Teacher and School Evaluation
The use of high-stakes tests to evaluate teachers and schools has been a contentious issue. In New York, for example, standardized testing has been used to assess both students and schools, with poorly performing schools facing potential overhaul and privatization. This approach has been criticized for being part of a larger neoliberal agenda aimed at reducing public expenditures and privatizing education.
Conclusion
The evidence on the effectiveness of high-stakes standardized testing in improving educational outcomes is mixed. While some studies suggest that these tests can motivate students and lead to gains in certain subjects, the overall impact on student achievement, teaching quality, and educational equity is questionable. High-stakes testing often perpetuates social inequalities and narrows the curriculum, potentially undermining the broader goals of education. Therefore, policymakers should consider these factors when designing and implementing educational reforms.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic