Do human biological races exists?
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Consensus Meter
The Existence of Human Biological Races: A Scientific Inquiry
Introduction to Human Biological Races
The concept of race has long been a subject of debate in both scientific and social contexts. While some argue for the existence of biological races in humans, others contend that race is a social construct without a biological basis. This article synthesizes current research to explore whether human biological races exist.
Biological Races and Ecotypes
One perspective suggests that human races, in a biological sense, can be understood as local populations adapted to specific environments, similar to the concept of ecotypes in ecology. These human ecotypic races, however, do not align with traditional 'folk' racial categories because similar ecotypes can have multiple independent origins. This indicates that while natural races may exist, they do not correspond to socially constructed racial categories.
Consensus Against Biological Races
A prevailing consensus among academics from various disciplines is that biological races do not exist in humans. This view is supported by the argument that race concepts and objects are socially constructed rather than biologically grounded. The methodological, empirical, and conceptual issues with defining biological races further support this consensus.
Genetic Variability and Clines
Research indicates that genetic variability among human populations does not conform to discrete packages labeled as races. Instead, genetic variation is continuous and better described by clines, which are gradual changes in certain characteristics over geographical areas. This continuous variation undermines the concept of distinct biological races.
Molecular Genetic Data and Adaptive Traits
Modern biological concepts of race, when tested with molecular genetic data, show that humans do not subdivide into races as some other species do, such as chimpanzees. Adaptive traits like skin color, often used to define races, reflect environmental adaptations rather than overall genetic differentiation. These traits do not provide objective criteria for defining races in humans.
Cladistic Race Concept
Some researchers, like Robin O. Andreasen, propose the cladistic race concept, which defines races based on common ancestry. However, this approach faces criticism for its application below the species level, suggesting that cladistic subspecies are not real and cannot serve as a basis for a realist concept of race .
Social Constructs and Biological Aggregates
The rejection of biological races is further supported by the argument that significant genetic differences required to define races do not exist among contemporary humans. Instead, human variation is better understood through the lens of social constructs like ethnicity, which, while having biological precursors, are primarily sociocultural categories.
Genomic Research and Clinal Classes
Recent genomic research challenges the notion that human races have no biological basis by identifying genetic clusters consistent with certain racial classifications. However, these clusters are better understood as clinal classes, which recognize the social perception of ancestry without diminishing the social context of race.
Conclusion
The majority of scientific evidence supports the view that human biological races do not exist. Genetic variability among humans is continuous and does not conform to discrete racial categories. While certain genetic clusters can be identified, they do not align with traditional racial classifications and are better understood through the concept of clinal classes. Thus, race remains a social construct with no significant biological foundation.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic