Institutional theory

Pro Research Analysisby

Searched over 200M research papers for "institutional theory"

Analyzed relevant papers

Consensus Meter

Yes88%

Possibly12%

No0%

Institutional Theory: An Overview and Critical Analysis

Introduction to Institutional Theory

Institutional theory has become a dominant framework for understanding macro-organizational phenomena, focusing on how organizational structures and processes acquire meaning and continuity beyond their technical goals. It has been widely adopted across various disciplines, including business, management, sociology, and information systems, to explore a range of research challenges.

Evolution and Diffusion of Institutional Theory

Institutional theory has evolved significantly since its inception, expanding its scope and integrating insights from other theoretical approaches. This evolution has led to its widespread use in explaining both individual and organizational actions. A comprehensive review of literature from 1978 to 2008 highlights that institutional theory is predominantly used in empirical and quantitative research, with a focus on organizations and firms as units of analysis.

Challenges and Criticisms

Overextension and Core Purpose

One of the primary criticisms of institutional theory is that it has been stretched far beyond its core purpose. Originally intended to understand how organizational structures and processes acquire meaning, the theory now risks losing its focus due to its broad application. This overextension has led to calls for a return to the theory's core assumptions and objectives, emphasizing categories, language, work, and aesthetics.

Power Dynamics

Another significant critique is the theory's insufficient attention to power dynamics. While institutional theory has borrowed concepts from more critical perspectives, it has often shied away from examining the problematic uses of power within institutions . This oversight limits the theory's potential to fully understand how power operates and influences institutional processes.

Institutional Change

Institutional theory has also been criticized for its focus on the persistence and homogeneity of phenomena, often neglecting the dynamic nature of institutional change. However, recent research has started to address this gap by exploring how institutions are created, transformed, and extinguished over time . Theories of institutional change now consider both deliberate creation through political processes and spontaneous emergence through evolutionary processes.

Integrating Institutional and Structuration Theories

To address some of the limitations of institutional theory, scholars have proposed integrating it with structuration theory. Both theories contend that institutions and actions are inextricably linked and that institutionalization is a dynamic, ongoing process. A fusion of these theories could advance institutional theory by providing a more comprehensive understanding of how institutions are created, altered, and reproduced.

Reconceptualizing Institutional Theory

There is a growing critique that institutional theory has become too broad and dispersed, making it difficult to identify its distinct contributions. Efforts to rejuvenate the field suggest reconceptualizing the theory to focus on its unique aspects and exploring alternative lines of development. This includes a more critical examination of how institutions influence actions and the inherent power hierarchies within organizational structures.

Conclusion

Institutional theory remains a powerful framework for understanding organizational phenomena, but it faces several challenges that need to be addressed. By refocusing on its core purpose, integrating insights from other theories, and critically examining power dynamics, institutional theory can continue to provide valuable insights into the complex processes of institutionalization and change.